Plasmapheresis centers · South Carolina

Immunotek BioCenters, LLC - Myrtle Beach, SC

Myrtle Beach, SC · ~28 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Immunotek BioCenters, LLC - Myrtle Beach, SC runs at 313% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Plasmapheresis centers workplace, earning a grade F.

Immunotek BioCenters, LLC - Myrtle Beach, SC: 11.9 TCR = 313% of Plasmapheresis centers BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Immunotek BioCenters, LLC - Myrtle Beach, SC safety composite

Immunotek BioCenters, LLC - Myrtle Beach, SC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.0

2016→2017

Immunotek BioCenters, LLC - Myrtle Beach, SC injury rate improved

Immunotek BioCenters, LLC - Myrtle Beach, SC's TCR fell 17.0 from 20.4 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 20.4 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=20.4 · 2017=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621991 · Myrtle Beach, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.9 · 313% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #34/35
  • PHOTO Casper, WY-BioLife
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Casper, WY-BioLife (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Immunotek BioCenters, LLC - Myrtle Beach, SC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Immunotek BioCenters, LLC - Myrtle Beach, SC averages 11.9 TCR (313% of the Plasmapheresis centers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Immunotek BioCenters, LLC - Myrtle Beach, SC TCR series: 2016=20.4 · 2017=3.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Immunotek BioCenters, LLC - Myrtle Beach, SC falls in its industry

1,713 Plasmapheresis centers establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 35 Plasmapheresis centers employers in South Carolina.

Immunotek BioCenters, LLC - Myrtle Beach, SC (28 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Immunotek BioCenters, LLC - Myrtle Beach, SC
Immunotek BioCenters, LLC - Myrtle Beach, SC (28 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Immunotek BioCenters, LLC - Myrtle Beach, SC has fewer employees than the Plasmapheresis centers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 3.4 0.0 0 1 0
2016 20.4 0.0 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621991 · SC · Myrtle Beach

1,713 Plasmapheresis centers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 244 employers in Myrtle Beach, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Casper, WY-BioLife 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NuPlasma 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dover Center 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAIND-OPI-INDIO 177 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE CREW QTRS SAVAGE ROAD 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE METER LAB 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Florence Transmission Headquarters 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mt. Pleasant Business Office 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA - Grand Strand Medical Center 1,584 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Strand Health 1,257 FTE
CITY-NEAR Founders National Golf, LLC 829 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocean Lakes Service Corp. 440 FTE
NAT-TCR Walnut Creek Assisted Living & Memory Care 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sonoma Valley School District 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Spring Hill Manufacturing 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Chicago Dept of Fleet and Facility Management - 5215 S. Western Blvd 11.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arizona Production Center 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0773 - Enterprise, Al 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0445 - Murrieta, Ca 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0196 - Albany, Ny 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.