Correctional institutions · Virginia

Indian Creek Correctional Center

Chesapeake, VA · ~239 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Indian Creek Correctional Center runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Correctional institutions workplace, earning a grade B.

Indian Creek Correctional Center: 1.9 TCR = 58% of Correctional institutions BLS 3.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Indian Creek Correctional Center safety composite

Indian Creek Correctional Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 54%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Indian Creek Correctional Center: 2.1 → 2.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.46× in 2024

Indian Creek Correctional Center's TCR rose 0.6 from 2.1 in 2018 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922140 · Chesapeake, VA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 58% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #13/51
  • PHOTO Florence Detention C…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~239 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Florence Detention Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Indian Creek Correctional Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Indian Creek Correctional Center averages 1.9 TCR (58% of the Correctional institutions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Indian Creek Correctional Center TCR series: 2018=2.1 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 3.2

Where Indian Creek Correctional Center falls in its industry

482 Correctional institutions establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 51 Correctional institutions employers in Virginia.

Indian Creek Correctional Center (239 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Indian Creek Correctional Center
Indian Creek Correctional Center (239 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Indian Creek Correctional Center has fewer employees than the Correctional institutions median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 2.7 7 0 0
2023 2.7 2.7 7 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2020 3.5 3.5 9 0 0
2019 1.2 1.2 3 0 0
2018 2.1 2.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922140 · VA · Chesapeake

482 Correctional institutions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 434 employers in Chesapeake, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Florence Detention Center 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR LEE ADJUSTMENT 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Deerfield Correctional Center 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wallens Ridge State Prison 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Woolwine Plant 239 FTE
STATE-SIZE Colortree Group Inc. 239 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Industries 239 FTE
STATE-SIZE 029-00517 239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ORF2 2,432 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chesapeake Regional Medical Center 2,059 FTE
CITY-NEAR QVC Chesapeake, Inc. 1,056 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crossways 931 FTE
NAT-TCR 9230 E. Imperial Hwy. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tutor Perini Civil 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lima Memorial Health System-MedPark 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bonannos New York Pizzeria #310 MGM Dome 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Schumacher Elevator Company 239 FTE
NAT-SIZE CS Wholesale Grocers : Aberdeen, MD (FDC) 239 FTE
NAT-SIZE M. G. McGrath, Inc. 239 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cypress Glen Retirement Community 239 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.