Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade · Pennsylvania

Industrial Metal Plating dba US Anodize

Reading, PA · ~52 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Industrial Metal Plating dba US Anodize runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade B.

Industrial Metal Plating dba US Anodize: 1.8 TCR = 56% of Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Industrial Metal Plating dba US Anodize safety composite

Industrial Metal Plating dba US Anodize scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2022→2024

Industrial Metal Plating dba US Anodize injury rate improved

Industrial Metal Plating dba US Anodize's TCR fell 5.5 from 5.5 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=5.5 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Reading, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 56% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/27
  • PHOTO D & W Plating Co., I…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: D & W Plating Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Industrial Metal Plating dba US Anodize in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Industrial Metal Plating dba US Anodize averages 1.8 TCR (56% of the Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Industrial Metal Plating dba US Anodize TCR series: 2022=5.5 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Industrial Metal Plating dba US Anodize falls in its industry

585 Anodizing metals and metal pro establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 27 Anodizing metals and metal pro employers in Pennsylvania.

Industrial Metal Plating dba US Anodize (52 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Industrial Metal Plating dba US Anodize
Industrial Metal Plating dba US Anodize (52 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Industrial Metal Plating dba US Anodize has fewer employees than the Anodizing metals and metal products for median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.1 0.1 3 0 0
2022 5.5 5.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · PA · Reading

585 Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR D & W Plating Co., Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Safe Plating, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Magnaplate 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR HCATR01 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maitri Genetics 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Insa Shamokin Dam 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ethos Fairless Hills 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR S.A. Comunale - Fremont 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Eufaula Indian Health Facility 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR National Coney Island - Shelby 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Audi Tampa 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE S.A. Comunale - Philadelphia 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnson Electric Coil Co., Inc 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aberdeen Crossings by New Perspective 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rusnak Porsche Westlake 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.