Insulation and cushioning, polystyrene foam plastics, manufacturing · California

Insulfoam - Chino

Chino, CA · ~54 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Insulfoam - Chino runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Insulation and cushioning, polystyrene foam plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Insulfoam - Chino: 3.5 TCR = 106% of Insulation and cushioning, polystyrene foam plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Insulfoam - Chino safety composite

Insulfoam - Chino scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Insulfoam - Chino: 0.0 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 5.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.5× in 2020

Insulfoam - Chino's TCR rose 3.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326140 · Chino, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 106% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #8/14
  • PHOTO Foam Fabricators Jac…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Foam Fabricators Jackson TN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Insulfoam - Chino in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Insulfoam - Chino averages 3.5 TCR (106% of the Insulation and cushioning, polystyrene foam plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Insulfoam - Chino TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=3.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Insulfoam - Chino falls in its industry

260 Insulation and cushioning, pol establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 14 Insulation and cushioning, pol employers in California.

Insulfoam - Chino (54 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Insulfoam - Chino
Insulfoam - Chino (54 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Insulfoam - Chino has fewer employees than the Insulation and cushioning, polystyrene f median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.5 1.7 2 0 0
2019 5.4 1.8 3 0 0
2018 5.2 1.7 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326140 · CA · Chino

260 Insulation and cushioning, polystyrene foam plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 268 employers in Chino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Foam Fabricators Jackson TN 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plastilite Corporation 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Styrene Products - Arcadia 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakeland EPS Plant 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sea Mist Farms 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harold E. Robben, Jr. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jose Maria Perez 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pauma Valley 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4078 2,902 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8103 2,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4078 1,732 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Institution for Men 1,680 FTE
NAT-TCR Volvo Cars of Austin 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The GroundsKeeper, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR AVPX - Avis Phoenix 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Tasca Lincoln Mercury Seekonk 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Uncle G's Management Corp 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Country Mart #2232 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premier Estates of Toledo LLC 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wood Brothers Trucking LLC 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.