Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · California

International Paper Stockton Litho

Stockton, CA · ~47 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

International Paper Stockton Litho runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

International Paper Stockton Litho: 0.5 TCR = 15% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

International Paper Stockton Litho safety composite

International Paper Stockton Litho scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2017→2020

International Paper Stockton Litho injury rate improved

International Paper Stockton Litho's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Stockton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/111
  • PHOTO Hood Container York
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hood Container York (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

International Paper Stockton Litho in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows International Paper Stockton Litho averages 0.5 TCR (15% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

International Paper Stockton Litho TCR series: 2017=2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where International Paper Stockton Litho falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 111 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in California.

International Paper Stockton Litho (47 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate International Paper Stockton Litho
International Paper Stockton Litho (47 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

International Paper Stockton Litho has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.0 2.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · CA · Stockton

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 605 employers in Stockton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hood Container York 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southeastern Packaging 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corona Container 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper - Gateway Sheets 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company,Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ruiz Farm Labor 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresh Valley Harvesting, LLC. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR LaSalette Care and Rehabilitation Center 5,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCKCX0ABX SCK - ABX 4,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-18 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDCR CA Health Care Facility 3,227 FTE
NAT-TCR Laurentide at Mashpee Commons 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Acuity Brands Lighting NEDC 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pfizer Inc 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Louisville ORR Safety 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : SGF - Springfield 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : RST - Rochester MN 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baker's IGA Newcomerstown 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE PVII Viera Manor Company, LLC 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.