Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing · Nebraska

International Sensor Systems, Inc.

Aurora, NE · ~28 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

International Sensor Systems, Inc. runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

International Sensor Systems, Inc.: 2.0 TCR = 62% of Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

International Sensor Systems, Inc. safety composite

International Sensor Systems, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

International Sensor Systems, Inc.: 0.0 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 7.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.54× in 2024

International Sensor Systems, Inc.'s TCR rose 3.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334418 · Aurora, NE AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK P28
  • PHOTO Sparton Onyx LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sparton Onyx LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

International Sensor Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows International Sensor Systems, Inc. averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

International Sensor Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=7.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where International Sensor Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

236 Printed circuit assemblies man establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
International Sensor Systems, Inc. (28 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate International Sensor Systems, Inc.
International Sensor Systems, Inc. (28 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.3

International Sensor Systems, Inc. has fewer employees than the Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 7.1 3.5 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.3 4.3 0 1 0
2019 3.8 3.8 0 1 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334418 · NE · Aurora

236 Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 17 employers in Aurora, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sparton Onyx LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR eCircuits Bue Springs 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oncore Manufacturing, LLC-Fremont 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crane Electronics Inc 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Central Sand & Gravel Co - Shop 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sargent Drilling Co 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Iowa/Missouri Region 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Celebrity Homes Inc. 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bonnavilla Homes 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR NEA 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora Cooperative - Corporate Office 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Westfield Quality Care of Aurora 107 FTE
NAT-TCR Store #33 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Wolfskill Energy Center 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Appleton Store 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Supported Independence Srvc of or - 795 Calvin 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE EC Lane Hotel, LLC 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plas-Tech Coatings 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Earth Energy Inc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cholla Livestock 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.