Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services · Texas

Irving FS (SSS, CSS)

Irving, TX · ~46 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Irving FS (SSS, CSS) runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services workplace, earning a grade B.

Irving FS (SSS, CSS): 1.6 TCR = 61% of Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS 2.6 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Irving FS (SSS, CSS) safety composite

Irving FS (SSS, CSS) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2016→2019

Irving FS (SSS, CSS) injury rate improved

Irving FS (SSS, CSS)'s TCR fell 4.3 from 4.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.3 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561621 · Irving, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/12
  • PHOTO GRE-CPIS-GREENVILLE,SC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GRE-CPIS-GREENVILLE,SC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Irving FS (SSS, CSS) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Irving FS (SSS, CSS) averages 1.6 TCR (61% of the Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Irving FS (SSS, CSS) TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=2 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Irving FS (SSS, CSS) falls in its industry

161 Security alarm systems sales c establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 12 Security alarm systems sales c employers in Texas.

Irving FS (SSS, CSS) (46 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Irving FS (SSS, CSS)
Irving FS (SSS, CSS) (46 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Irving FS (SSS, CSS) has more employees than the Security alarm systems sales combined wi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.3 2.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561621 · TX · Irving

161 Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 548 employers in Irving, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GRE-CPIS-GREENVILLE,SC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riverside FS (SSS, CSS) 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fishers #X Logic FS (SSS, CSS) 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Total Fire & Safety, Inc 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coolwater 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE HALE CENTER FEED YARD 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wrangler Feedyard 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE SPG TEXAS COMPLEX -EST 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR 50CP001 CORP LAS COLINAS 4,366 FTE
CITY-NEAR TXC101551 2,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCH Corporation 2727 1,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - RBD5 1,964 FTE
NAT-TCR City Furniture Fort Lauderdale #01 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company-Midwest, LLC 6299 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Caraustar Industries, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Printing/Manufacturing II 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Allegheny Childrens Initiative Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE JR Simplot-Pasco Farm 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE JR Simplot Company-SGS Bakersfield 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodview Home 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.