Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services · California

Riverside FS (SSS, CSS)

Riverside, CA · ~32 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riverside FS (SSS, CSS) runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services workplace, earning a grade B.

Riverside FS (SSS, CSS): 1.6 TCR = 60% of Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS 2.6 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riverside FS (SSS, CSS) safety composite

Riverside FS (SSS, CSS) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2021

Riverside FS (SSS, CSS) injury rate improved

Riverside FS (SSS, CSS)'s TCR fell 3.4 from 6.4 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561621 · Riverside, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 60% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/21
  • PHOTO GRE-CPIS-GREENVILLE,SC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GRE-CPIS-GREENVILLE,SC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Riverside FS (SSS, CSS) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Riverside FS (SSS, CSS) averages 1.6 TCR (60% of the Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Riverside FS (SSS, CSS) TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3 · BLS 2.6

Where Riverside FS (SSS, CSS) falls in its industry

161 Security alarm systems sales c establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 21 Security alarm systems sales c employers in California.

Riverside FS (SSS, CSS) (32 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Riverside FS (SSS, CSS)
Riverside FS (SSS, CSS) (32 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Riverside FS (SSS, CSS) has fewer employees than the Security alarm systems sales combined wi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.4 3.2 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561621 · CA · Riverside

161 Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 536 employers in Riverside, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GRE-CPIS-GREENVILLE,SC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fishers #X Logic FS (SSS, CSS) 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Irving FS (SSS, CSS) 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Toepfer Security Corp. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schreiner Farms 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE FIVE POINTS T.I.C. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE OFFICE 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brocchini Farms Inc. 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Riverside 8,676 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-21 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Community Hospital 2,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08681351 RIVERSIDE MED CENTER 2,349 FTE
NAT-TCR Fire & Life Safety America Corporate Office 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Steel Industries - Plant 4 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Piggly Wiggly #275 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 42361b - Marmora 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Enviro Waste 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Early LIFE Center 14 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE The DM Burr Group - Southgate Schools 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE The DM Burr Group - Pontiac Schools 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.