Enforcement of environmental and pollution control regulations · California

IRWM - North Central Region Office

West Sacramento, CA · ~69 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

IRWM - North Central Region Office runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Enforcement of environmental and pollution control regulations workplace, earning a grade B.

IRWM - North Central Region Office: 1.7 TCR = 53% of Enforcement of environmental and pollution control regulations BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

IRWM - North Central Region Office safety composite

IRWM - North Central Region Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2017→2018

IRWM - North Central Region Office injury rate improved

IRWM - North Central Region Office's TCR fell 3.4 from 3.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.4 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.4 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924110 · West Sacramento, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/56
  • PHOTO Manchester Lab
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Manchester Lab (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

IRWM - North Central Region Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows IRWM - North Central Region Office averages 1.7 TCR (53% of the Enforcement of environmental and pollution control regulations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

IRWM - North Central Region Office TCR series: 2017=3.4 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.2

Where IRWM - North Central Region Office falls in its industry

131 Enforcement of environmental a establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 56 Enforcement of environmental a employers in California.

IRWM - North Central Region Office (69 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate IRWM - North Central Region Office
IRWM - North Central Region Office (69 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5

IRWM - North Central Region Office has fewer employees than the Enforcement of environmental and polluti median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.4 1.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924110 · CA · West Sacramento

131 Enforcement of environmental and pollution control regulations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 188 employers in West Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Manchester Lab 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR IRWM - Southern Region Office 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Air Quality 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Human Resources Office 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Woolf Enterprises 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terranova Ranch, Inc 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rayo Shop 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Harvesting | Citrus Harvesting 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR HEADQUARTERS: COMBINED ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS 6,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Administration 4,185 FTE
CITY-NEAR Department of General Services 3,631 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 36 2,161 FTE
NAT-TCR 85- Hake 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR APM Terminals Port Elizabeth 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Oldcastle OPI - Jacksonville 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #0232 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and R of North Columbia LLC 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of St James LLC 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Independence LLC 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Comfort 1 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.