Building cleaning services, janitorial · Pennsylvania

ISS Facility Services, Northeast Division

Pittsburgh, PA · ~3,038 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ISS Facility Services, Northeast Division runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade A.

ISS Facility Services, Northeast Division: 1.0 TCR = 22% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ISS Facility Services, Northeast Division safety composite

ISS Facility Services, Northeast Division scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

ISS Facility Services, Northeast Division held a steady TCR band

ISS Facility Services, Northeast Division's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.0 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.0 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.0 · 2017=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #18/179
  • PHOTO SMS 1363/1408
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~3,038 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SMS 1363/1408 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

ISS Facility Services, Northeast Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ISS Facility Services, Northeast Division averages 1.0 TCR (22% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ISS Facility Services, Northeast Division TCR series: 2016=1 · 2017=1 · BLS 4.5

Where ISS Facility Services, Northeast Division falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 179 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Pennsylvania.

ISS Facility Services, Northeast Division (3,038 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ISS Facility Services, Northeast Division
ISS Facility Services, Northeast Division (3,038 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

ISS Facility Services, Northeast Division has more employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 1.0 0.4 21 0 0
2016 1.0 0.8 19 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · PA · Pittsburgh

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SMS 1363/1408 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ameri-Kleen - Minnesota Branch 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT ULL EVS 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scopes Facility Services 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE St. Luke's Physician's Group 3,041 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pyramid Healthcare Inc 3,019 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pennsylvania Hospital 3,072 FTE
STATE-SIZE Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC 3,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR HBSHSESC30 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lone Star Paving Company - Austin 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Velociti Operational Headquarters 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR All Aboard America! School Transportation 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 001Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas 3,038 FTE
NAT-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : EWR9 3,039 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sharp Memorial Hospital 3,039 FTE
NAT-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MCO1 3,036 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.