Building cleaning services, janitorial · Texas

ISS Facility Services, Southwest Division

San Antonio, TX · ~1,618 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ISS Facility Services, Southwest Division runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade B.

ISS Facility Services, Southwest Division: 2.8 TCR = 62% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ISS Facility Services, Southwest Division safety composite

ISS Facility Services, Southwest Division scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2017

ISS Facility Services, Southwest Division injury rate improved

ISS Facility Services, Southwest Division's TCR fell 1.0 from 3.3 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.3 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2017=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · San Antonio, TX AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 2.8 · 62% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #205/417
  • PHOTO Environment Control …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 79 inj
  • SIZE ~1,618 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Environment Control Ohio Valley, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

ISS Facility Services, Southwest Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ISS Facility Services, Southwest Division averages 2.8 TCR (62% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ISS Facility Services, Southwest Division TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=2.3 · BLS 4.5

Where ISS Facility Services, Southwest Division falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #205 safest of 417 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Texas.

ISS Facility Services, Southwest Division (1,618 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ISS Facility Services, Southwest Division
ISS Facility Services, Southwest Division (1,618 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

ISS Facility Services, Southwest Division has more employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 2.3 1.5 31 0 0
2016 3.3 2.1 48 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · TX · San Antonio

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Environment Control Ohio Valley, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR AdventHealth MC Hinsdale 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milne Point HSK 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR FCA Stellantis MI Jefferson North Assembly Plant 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Barton Campus 1,619 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manufacture of Seats 1,621 FTE
STATE-SIZE TXRTH - HASLET HUB 1,613 FTE
STATE-SIZE Webber 1,624 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlanta 04 Bondo 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR LKC CBTC Flushing 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR MS - Portsmouth, VA - 5POVA 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR HES Duncan, OK (Plant 2) 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Century Park - Bld: 5331 - 01 1,618 FTE
NAT-SIZE Microchip Chandler 1,618 FTE
NAT-SIZE Viejas Casino 1,619 FTE
NAT-SIZE Micron INC. Manassas, VA 1,617 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.