BUILDINGS OPERATION BY CONTRACTORS · Georgia

Its Maid Day

Kennesaw, GA · ~30 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Its Maid Day runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical BUILDINGS OPERATION BY CONTRACTORS workplace, earning a grade A.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
avg TCR · per 100 workers
4.5
industry benchmark (BLS)
1
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Its Maid Day's OSHA Total Case Rate of 1.6 to the BUILDINGS OPERATION BY CONTRACTORS BLS benchmark of 4.5 (35% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

Its Maid Day's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 4.5 industry benchmark.

-1012345 20162020 04.5 Industry benchmarkIts Maid Day TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 561720.

Where Its Maid Day falls in its industry

5,186 BUILDINGS OPERATION BY CONTRAC establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #68 safest of 190 BUILDINGS OPERATION BY CONTRAC employers in Georgia.

Trend analysis for Its Maid Day

Between 2016 and 2020, Its Maid Day's Total Case Rate improved from 3.2 to 0.0 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 100% decrease across 4 years of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2020, at a TCR of 0.0, while 2016 saw the highest rate, at 3.2, a spread of 3.2 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.

Summed across those 2 reporting years, Its Maid Day recorded 1 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 1 injuries shown on this page for Its Maid Day are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 561720 - BUILDINGS OPERATION BY CONTRACTORS.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2020)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 53,717 hours worked = 0.00 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Its Maid Day (this establishment) 1.59 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg
Janitorial services industry avg 4.50 BLS IIF, NAICS 561720
Georgia state avg (all industries) 4.11 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Its Maid Day to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.2 3.2 1 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Its Maid Day's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its BUILDINGS OPERATION BY CONTRACTORS peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.

  • At 35% of the BUILDINGS OPERATION BY CONTRACTORS benchmark, Its Maid Day reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider BUILDINGS OPERATION BY CONTRACTORS sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Its Maid Day's safety grade?
Its Maid Day has a safety grade of A (Excellent Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.6 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 4.5 for BUILDINGS OPERATION BY CONTRACTORS.
How many injuries has Its Maid Day reported?
Its Maid Day has reported 1 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 2 years of OSHA data (2020, 2016). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Georgia, and by nearby establishments in Kennesaw - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.