Food machinery repair and maintenance services · Colorado

ITW/Hobart Service-Denver Branch

Denver, CO · ~30 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ITW/Hobart Service-Denver Branch runs at 307% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Food machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

ITW/Hobart Service-Denver Branch: 6.4 TCR = 307% of Food machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ITW/Hobart Service-Denver Branch safety composite

ITW/Hobart Service-Denver Branch scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2022→2023

ITW/Hobart Service-Denver Branch injury rate improved

ITW/Hobart Service-Denver Branch's TCR fell 2.1 from 7.5 in 2022 to 5.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=7.5 · 2023=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Denver, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.4 · 307% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #41/46
  • PHOTO Alta Industrial Equi…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alta Industrial Equipment Company Calumet City (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

ITW/Hobart Service-Denver Branch in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ITW/Hobart Service-Denver Branch averages 6.4 TCR (307% of the Food machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ITW/Hobart Service-Denver Branch TCR series: 2022=7.5 · 2023=5.4 · BLS 2.1

Where ITW/Hobart Service-Denver Branch falls in its industry

2,560 Food machinery repair and main establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 46 Food machinery repair and main employers in Colorado.

ITW/Hobart Service-Denver Branch (30 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate ITW/Hobart Service-Denver Branch
ITW/Hobart Service-Denver Branch (30 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

ITW/Hobart Service-Denver Branch has fewer employees than the Food machinery repair and maintenance se median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.4 2.7 2 0 0
2022 7.5 3.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · CO · Denver

2,560 Food machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 1,757 employers in Denver, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alta Industrial Equipment Company Calumet City 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hussmann Services Corporation - Lenexa 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Industrial Service, Inc 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NMC Group Omaha Material Handling 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 5280 S Services LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE KP Squared LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Evergreen Service Center 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Krueger Construction Management LLC 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN DEN 9,832 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-DEN 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN - Airport United Airlines Offices 5,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR CO-01 4,581 FTE
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1995 Apple Valley, CA 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Memorial Hermann Home Healthcare 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 2010-Ucpmc-Sheehan Ira 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #5339 Waynesboro, VA 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Airgas Specialty Gases - Chicago 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Form 300A Kenlake State Resort PARK 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE JP Lamborn - Lakeland 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anchorage 6415 Arctic 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.