Heating contractors · Minnesota

J-Berd Mechanical

St Cloud, MN · ~352 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

J-Berd Mechanical runs at 463% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Heating contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.9
avg TCR · per 100 workers
2.8
industry benchmark (BLS)
97
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares J-Berd Mechanical's OSHA Total Case Rate of 12.9 to the Heating contractors BLS benchmark of 2.8 (463% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

J-Berd Mechanical's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 2.8 industry benchmark.

051015 20172018 12.32.8 Industry benchmarkJ-Berd Mechanical TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 238220.

Where J-Berd Mechanical falls in its industry

6,536 Heating contractors establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #151 safest of 165 Heating contractors employers in Minnesota.

Trend analysis for J-Berd Mechanical

Between 2017 and 2018, J-Berd Mechanical's Total Case Rate improved from 13.6 to 12.3 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 10% decrease across 1 year of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2018, at a TCR of 12.3, while 2017 saw the highest rate, at 13.6, a spread of 1.3 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.

Summed across those 2 reporting years, J-Berd Mechanical recorded 97 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 97 injuries shown on this page for J-Berd Mechanical are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 238220 - Heating contractors.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2018)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

18 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 731,738 hours worked = 4.92 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
J-Berd Mechanical (this establishment) 12.95 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg
Mechanical contractors industry avg 2.80 BLS IIF, NAICS 238220
Minnesota state avg (all industries) 5.18 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by J-Berd Mechanical to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 12.3 4.9 45 0 0
2017 13.6 6.3 52 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on J-Berd Mechanical's reported OSHA injury record versus its Heating contractors peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.

  • At 463% of the Heating contractors benchmark, J-Berd Mechanical reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Heating contractors sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is J-Berd Mechanical's safety grade?
J-Berd Mechanical has a safety grade of F (Failing Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 12.9 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 2.8 for Heating contractors.
How many injuries has J-Berd Mechanical reported?
J-Berd Mechanical has reported 97 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 2 years of OSHA data (2018, 2017). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Minnesota, and by nearby establishments in St Cloud - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.