Inhalators, surgical and medical, manufacturing · Minnesota

Jabil Healthcare - Reprocessing

Maple Grove, MN · ~134 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jabil Healthcare - Reprocessing runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Inhalators, surgical and medical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Jabil Healthcare - Reprocessing: 1.9 TCR = 58% of Inhalators, surgical and medical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jabil Healthcare - Reprocessing safety composite

Jabil Healthcare - Reprocessing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Jabil Healthcare - Reprocessing held a steady TCR band

Jabil Healthcare - Reprocessing's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.6 in 2018 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.6 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339112 · Maple Grove, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 58% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #39/56
  • PHOTO Serim Research Corpo…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Serim Research Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Jabil Healthcare - Reprocessing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jabil Healthcare - Reprocessing averages 1.9 TCR (58% of the Inhalators, surgical and medical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jabil Healthcare - Reprocessing TCR series: 2018=1.6 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Jabil Healthcare - Reprocessing falls in its industry

741 Inhalators, surgical and medic establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 56 Inhalators, surgical and medic employers in Minnesota.

Jabil Healthcare - Reprocessing (134 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Jabil Healthcare - Reprocessing
Jabil Healthcare - Reprocessing (134 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Jabil Healthcare - Reprocessing has fewer employees than the Inhalators, surgical and medical, manufa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.7 1 1 0
2023 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2022 3.3 2.5 4 0 0
2021 1.7 0.0 2 0 0
2020 2.1 2.1 3 0 0
2018 1.6 1.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339112 · MN · Maple Grove

741 Inhalators, surgical and medical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 238 employers in Maple Grove, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Serim Research Corporation 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Axcesor Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vyaire Medical, Palm Springs 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Collagen Matrix 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tuffys Pet Treat Inc 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Norbord Minnesota 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Behrens Manufacturing, LLC 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sheet Metal Connectors Inc 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boston Scientific Corporation 5,324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maple Grove Hospital 1,016 FTE
CITY-NEAR MNMPL - MAPLE GROVE 932 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAPLE GROVE (MNMPL) 760 FTE
NAT-TCR USA Custom Pad Corp 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wat-Kem Mechanical, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bates Electric Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Gaines County Harvesters, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE ADAMA 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garfield Memorial Hospital 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE BAE Systems I&S - Lexington Park 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Radial Inc MTV 1 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.