Profile shapes (e.g., plate, rod, sheet), laminated plastics, manufacturing · Indiana

Jaeger-Unitek Sealing Solutions, Inc.

La Porte, IN · ~107 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jaeger-Unitek Sealing Solutions, Inc. runs at 94% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Profile shapes (e.g., plate, rod, sheet), laminated plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Jaeger-Unitek Sealing Solutions, Inc.: 3.1 TCR = 94% of Profile shapes (e.g., plate, rod, sheet), laminated plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jaeger-Unitek Sealing Solutions, Inc. safety composite

Jaeger-Unitek Sealing Solutions, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2018

Jaeger-Unitek Sealing Solutions, Inc. injury rate improved

Jaeger-Unitek Sealing Solutions, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.4 from 3.3 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2018=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326130 · La Porte, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 94% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #4/7
  • PHOTO FLEXcon Industrial, …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FLEXcon Industrial, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Jaeger-Unitek Sealing Solutions, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jaeger-Unitek Sealing Solutions, Inc. averages 3.1 TCR (94% of the Profile shapes (e.g., plate, rod, sheet), laminated plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jaeger-Unitek Sealing Solutions, Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2018=2.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Jaeger-Unitek Sealing Solutions, Inc. falls in its industry

160 Profile shapes (e.g., plate, r establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 7 Profile shapes (e.g., plate, r employers in Indiana.

Jaeger-Unitek Sealing Solutions, Inc. (107 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Jaeger-Unitek Sealing Solutions, Inc.
Jaeger-Unitek Sealing Solutions, Inc. (107 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Jaeger-Unitek Sealing Solutions, Inc. has more employees than the Profile shapes (e.g., plate, rod, sheet) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.9 1.5 2 0 0
2016 3.3 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326130 · IN · La Porte

160 Profile shapes (e.g., plate, rod, sheet), laminated plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 45 employers in La Porte, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FLEXcon Industrial, LLC 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SCS Desco 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Angleboard Plastics 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PTI 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Plymouth, IN 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2580-Remington, IN (Monsanto Co.) 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Koetter Construction 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Layne Christensen 1468 West Hospital Road 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR La Porte Hospital Company LLC 741 FTE
CITY-NEAR Howmet - La Porte Castings 716 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2276 316 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holsum of Fort Wayne, INc 306 FTE
NAT-TCR dd's DISCOUNTS Store 5202 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Swainsboro (Gaswa) 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #3165 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Global Services Supply Chain Operations : Kansas City, MO 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. - Permian Infrastructure Group 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE JLM Advanced Tech. Service 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Campbellsville (Kycam) 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goldsboro Center (Ncgol) 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.