Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, plastics, manufacturing · Tennessee

Jagemann Precision Plastics

Murfreesboro, TN · ~109 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jagemann Precision Plastics runs at 147% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Jagemann Precision Plastics: 4.8 TCR = 147% of Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jagemann Precision Plastics safety composite

Jagemann Precision Plastics scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2016→2022

Jagemann Precision Plastics injury rate improved

Jagemann Precision Plastics's TCR fell 3.8 from 6.3 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.3 · 2018=2.0 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Murfreesboro, TN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 147% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #50/66
  • PHOTO Mack Molding Company…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mack Molding Company - Statesville NC location (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Jagemann Precision Plastics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jagemann Precision Plastics averages 4.8 TCR (147% of the Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jagemann Precision Plastics TCR series: 2016=6.3 · 2018=2 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Jagemann Precision Plastics falls in its industry

2,838 Motor vehicle moldings and ext establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 66 Motor vehicle moldings and ext employers in Tennessee.

Jagemann Precision Plastics (109 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Jagemann Precision Plastics
Jagemann Precision Plastics (109 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Jagemann Precision Plastics has more employees than the Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, p median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.4 1.2 2 0 0
2021 4.7 0.9 4 1 0
2020 6.6 2.8 5 2 0
2019 7.1 0.0 5 0 0
2018 2.0 1.0 2 0 0
2016 6.3 3.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · TN · Murfreesboro

2,838 Motor vehicle moldings and extrusions, plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 256 employers in Murfreesboro, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mack Molding Company - Statesville NC location 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR JSP - Butler 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pharmacy-Lite Packaging 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schaefer Systems - MFGNC 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Structural Systems, Inc. 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rackley Roofing Co Inc 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vietti Acquisitions LLC 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bath Fitter Manufacturing Inc 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Murfreesboro 2,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR TNNAS16 ASCENSION SAINT THOMAS RUTHERFORD 1,984 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BNA3 1,811 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : BNA3 1,708 FTE
NAT-TCR Gateway Health & Rehab 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR VSPOne Olympia 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Landmark Management Group, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ulta Beauty 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tops #237 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE GCA Logistics LLC 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Home Office 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE D&H Contracting Inc. 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.