Cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Jarp Industries

Schofield, WI · ~147 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jarp Industries runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Jarp Industries: 3.0 TCR = 92% of Cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jarp Industries safety composite

Jarp Industries scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2024

Jarp Industries injury rate improved

Jarp Industries's TCR fell 2.0 from 5.1 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.1 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333995 · Schofield, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 92% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #5/9
  • PHOTO Prince Manufacturing…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~147 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Prince Manufacturing Corporation-Brookings (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Jarp Industries in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jarp Industries averages 3.0 TCR (92% of the Cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jarp Industries TCR series: 2016=5.1 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Jarp Industries falls in its industry

137 Cylinders, fluid power, manufa establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 9 Cylinders, fluid power, manufa employers in Wisconsin.

Jarp Industries (147 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Jarp Industries
Jarp Industries (147 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Jarp Industries has more employees than the Cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 0.8 4 0 0
2023 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2022 5.5 3.9 7 0 0
2021 2.5 0.8 3 0 0
2020 2.6 0.9 3 0 0
2019 3.8 2.5 6 0 0
2018 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2017 2.2 2.2 4 0 0
2016 5.1 0.8 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333995 · WI · Schofield

137 Cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 59 employers in Schofield, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Prince Manufacturing Corporation-Brookings 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Engineering Company Plant 2 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR R & J Cylinder and Machine, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milwaukee Cylinder - Cudahy 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE CC&N 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE VPP Group, LLC 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Klement's Sausage Company, Inc. - Chase Plant 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE Asenzya Inc. 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greenheck Fan Corporation 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schofield Facility 615 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crystal Finishing Systems - Schofield 607 FTE
CITY-NEAR Asplundh Tree Expert LLC - 062 438 FTE
NAT-TCR Airborne Maintenance and Engineering Services, ILN, Wilmington OH 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR PRT, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pratt and Whitney Engine Services, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HOA Joplin 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lady Farms Inc, Pennsylvania 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baytown 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rochester Hill Technical Center 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Danella Construction Corporation of Pennsylvania 147 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.