Construction management, water and sewer line · Texas

JD Twilla Enterprises

Spring, TX · ~31 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JD Twilla Enterprises runs at 754% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Construction management, water and sewer line workplace, earning a grade F.

JD Twilla Enterprises: 21.1 TCR = 754% of Construction management, water and sewer line BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JD Twilla Enterprises safety composite

JD Twilla Enterprises scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2017→2024

JD Twilla Enterprises injury rate improved

JD Twilla Enterprises's TCR fell 0.8 from 15.5 in 2017 to 14.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 28.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=15.5 · 2018=28.6 · 2019=25.4 · 2020=23.4 · 2021=20.6 · 2022=26.0 · 2023=14.5 · 2024=14.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Spring, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.1 · 754% of ind

  • DART 8.9 DART
  • RANK #194/194
  • PHOTO Sargent Irrigation
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sargent Irrigation (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

JD Twilla Enterprises in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JD Twilla Enterprises averages 21.1 TCR (754% of the Construction management, water and sewer line BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JD Twilla Enterprises TCR series: 2017=15.5 · 2018=28.6 · 2019=25.4 · 2020=23.4 · 2021=20.6 · 2022=26 · 2023=14.5 · 2024=14.8 · BLS 2.8

Where JD Twilla Enterprises falls in its industry

1,614 Construction management, water establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #194 safest of 194 Construction management, water employers in Texas.

JD Twilla Enterprises (31 employees, TCR 21.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate JD Twilla Enterprises
JD Twilla Enterprises (31 employees, TCR 21.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

JD Twilla Enterprises has fewer employees than the Construction management, water and sewer median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.8 8.9 4 1 0
2023 14.5 11.6 2 3 0
2022 26.0 13.0 8 0 0
2021 20.6 17.6 7 0 0
2020 23.4 7.8 9 0 0
2019 25.4 19.8 7 2 0
2018 28.6 17.1 4 6 0
2017 15.5 9.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · TX · Spring

1,614 Construction management, water and sewer line employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 212 employers in Spring, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sargent Irrigation 20.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PW UTILITIES - WATER LINE & FIRE HYDRANT REPAIR 20.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Rockville Public Works Maintenance 21.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Freeport Water & Sewer Department - City of Freeport 22.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE TREES USA 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Treeland Nursery Inc 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE 145 Ranch LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Tulia 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Exxon Mobil Corporation Houston Campus 5,480 FTE
CITY-NEAR HP Inc. Houston 2,348 FTE
CITY-NEAR ExxonMobil Global Services Company Houston Campus 2,050 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Bureau of Shipping 1,159 FTE
NAT-TCR Juvenile Hall 21.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hennepin County Medical Center - Brooklyn Park Clinic 21.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 287185-Stl-Ferguson Br 21.1 TCR
NAT-TCR King's Daughters 21.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE T E Davis Construction Company 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tube Fabrication Industries, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Home Office 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Alexandria 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.