Low voltage electrical work · Arizona

JFK Electrical Contracting Enterprises, Inc.

Gilbert, AZ · ~57 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JFK Electrical Contracting Enterprises, Inc. runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Low voltage electrical work workplace, earning a grade A.

JFK Electrical Contracting Enterprises, Inc.: 0.5 TCR = 18% of Low voltage electrical work BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JFK Electrical Contracting Enterprises, Inc. safety composite

JFK Electrical Contracting Enterprises, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

JFK Electrical Contracting Enterprises, Inc. held a steady TCR band

JFK Electrical Contracting Enterprises, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.8 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Gilbert, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/105
  • PHOTO Dynalectric Oregon
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dynalectric Oregon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

JFK Electrical Contracting Enterprises, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JFK Electrical Contracting Enterprises, Inc. averages 0.5 TCR (18% of the Low voltage electrical work BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JFK Electrical Contracting Enterprises, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.8 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.8

Where JFK Electrical Contracting Enterprises, Inc. falls in its industry

4,550 Low voltage electrical work establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 105 Low voltage electrical work employers in Arizona.

JFK Electrical Contracting Enterprises, Inc. (57 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate JFK Electrical Contracting Enterprises, Inc.
JFK Electrical Contracting Enterprises, Inc. (57 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

JFK Electrical Contracting Enterprises, Inc. has fewer employees than the Low voltage electrical work median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2019 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · AZ · Gilbert

4,550 Low voltage electrical work employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 261 employers in Gilbert, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dynalectric Oregon 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hi-Tech Electric - Dallas 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Piquette & Howard Electric Service, LLC 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tele-Optics Communication Inc. 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Metro Water District 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eagle Mountain Construcgtion 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Juarez contracting 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE VSS International, Inc. Arizona Construction 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030512 1,613 FTE
CITY-NEAR Town of Gilbert 1,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030512-512001 1,286 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-512 911 FTE
NAT-TCR Massey Services 60 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Tenet North Shore 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SF Van Ness 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1359-Duke Midwest Region 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Martin Wine Cellar (Metairie) 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sand Creek Timber Frames 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE MSN pharmaceutical Inc 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE N & S Tractor - Merced 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.