Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) · Nevada
job site IM
Las Vegas, NV · ~88 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- D
- Poor Safety Record
- 3.5
- Avg TCR
- 2.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
job site IM runs at 125% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) workplace, earning a grade D.
- D
- Poor Safety Record
- 3.5
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 2.8
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 5
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares job site IM's OSHA Total Case Rate of 3.5 to the Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS benchmark of 2.8 (125% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
job site IM's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 2.8 industry benchmark.
Where job site IM falls in its industry
2,497 Fencing contractors (except el establishmentsSafer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.
Narrower to Nevada alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 25 Fencing contractors (except el employers in Nevada.
Trend analysis for job site IM
Between 2022 and 2023, job site IM's Total Case Rate worsened from 2.6 to 4.5 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 74% increase across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2022, at a TCR of 2.6, while 2023 saw the highest rate, at 4.5, a spread of 1.9 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, job site IM recorded 5 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 5 injuries, 1 illnesses shown on this page for job site IM are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 238990 - Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets).
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2023)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
4 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 179,404 hours worked = 4.46 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| job site IM (this establishment) | 3.51 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) industry avg | 2.80 | BLS IIF, NAICS 238990 |
| Nevada state avg (all industries) | 5.05 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by job site IM to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2023: 4 reportable incidents · 4 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2022: 2 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 1 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on job site IM's reported OSHA injury record versus its Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 125% of the Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) benchmark, job site IM reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is job site IM's safety grade?
How many injuries has job site IM reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Nevada, and by nearby establishments in Las Vegas - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~3.5)
Similar size (~88 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.