Loaded computer boards manufacturing · North Dakota
John Deere Electronic Solutions
Fargo, ND · ~820 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 0.6
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
John Deere Electronic Solutions runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Loaded computer boards manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.
John Deere Electronic Solutions: 0.6 TCR = 19% of Loaded computer boards manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)
John Deere Electronic Solutions safety composite
John Deere Electronic Solutions scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
57/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- B 0.63 per 100 workers
Safer than 78% of industry peers
- DART rate
- D 0.78 per 100 workers
Safer than 38% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 50% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
John Deere Electronic Solutions held a steady TCR band
John Deere Electronic Solutions's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.8 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2016=0.8 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0.9
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 334418 · Fargo, ND AT/BELOW-IND · MID
Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 19% of ind
- DART 0.8 DART
- RANK P78
- PHOTO Artesyn190
- BOOK 5y book
- INJ 26 inj
- SIZE ~820 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: Artesyn190 (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →
John Deere Electronic Solutions in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
John Deere Electronic Solutions
0.6 TCR
- Artesyn190
Artesyn190
0.6 TCR
- Logic PD Eden
Logic PD Eden Prairie
0.6 TCR
- Kent Displays,
Kent Displays, Incorporated
0.6 TCR
- Trenton Techno
Trenton Technology, Inc.
0.6 TCR
What this shows John Deere Electronic Solutions averages 0.6 TCR (19% of the Loaded computer boards manufacturing BLS benchmark).
John Deere Electronic Solutions TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0.9 · BLS 3.3
Where John Deere Electronic Solutions falls in its industry
236 Loaded computer boards manufac establishmentsSafer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.
John Deere Electronic Solutions has more employees than the Loaded computer boards manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 7 | 1 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 6 | 1 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
334418 · ND · Fargo
236 Loaded computer boards manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 415 employers in Fargo, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.