Fuel cells, electrochemical generators, manufacturing · Connecticut

FuelCell Energy - Danbury

Danbury, CT · ~229 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

FuelCell Energy - Danbury runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fuel cells, electrochemical generators, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

FuelCell Energy - Danbury: 0.6 TCR = 19% of Fuel cells, electrochemical generators, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

FuelCell Energy - Danbury safety composite

FuelCell Energy - Danbury scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2021

FuelCell Energy - Danbury injury rate improved

FuelCell Energy - Danbury's TCR fell 0.4 from 0.9 in 2016 to 0.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.92× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.9 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=0.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335999 · Danbury, CT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #2/9
  • PHOTO Princetel, Inc. DBA …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~229 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Princetel, Inc. DBA Wendon Engineering (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

FuelCell Energy - Danbury in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows FuelCell Energy - Danbury averages 0.6 TCR (19% of the Fuel cells, electrochemical generators, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

FuelCell Energy - Danbury TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=0.4 · 2019=0 · 2021=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where FuelCell Energy - Danbury falls in its industry

219 Fuel cells, electrochemical ge establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 9 Fuel cells, electrochemical ge employers in Connecticut.

FuelCell Energy - Danbury (229 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 91 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate FuelCell Energy - Danbury
FuelCell Energy - Danbury (229 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 91 employees and a TCR of 1.9

FuelCell Energy - Danbury has more employees than the Fuel cells, electrochemical generators, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.2 0.4 3 0 0
2016 0.9 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335999 · CT · Danbury

219 Fuel cells, electrochemical generators, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 171 employers in Danbury, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Princetel, Inc. DBA Wendon Engineering 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR OAU 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCORE Electric 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Premier PV 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CREC Central 229 FTE
STATE-SIZE New England Home Care-Waterbury 229 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bayview Health Care 229 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glastonbury Health Care Center Inc 229 FTE
CITY-NEAR DANBURY HOSPITAL INC. 2,822 FTE
CITY-NEAR Board of Education 2,209 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western CT Medical Group 1,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Connecticut Medical Group 1,239 FTE
NAT-TCR John Deere Electronic Solutions 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Municipal Energy Services Agency 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Country Mart #3806 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Insteel Wire Products - Hickman, KY 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pittsburgh at University Center Oakland 229 FTE
NAT-SIZE Non Manufacturing 229 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meijer Distribution - Pleasant Praire - Unit 872 229 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jordano's Food Service 229 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.