General medical and surgical hospitals · Maryland

Johns Hopkins Health System

Baltimore, MD · ~4,124 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Johns Hopkins Health System runs at 11% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General medical and surgical hospitals workplace, earning a grade A.

Johns Hopkins Health System: 0.8 TCR = 11% of General medical and surgical hospitals BLS 7.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Johns Hopkins Health System safety composite

Johns Hopkins Health System scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Johns Hopkins Health System: 0.6 → 1.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.7× in 2024

Johns Hopkins Health System's TCR rose 0.6 from 0.6 in 2017 to 1.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Baltimore, MD AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 11% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #4/70
  • PHOTO LVH-1503 N. Cedar Cr…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 160 inj
  • SIZE ~4,124 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LVH-1503 N. Cedar Crest (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Johns Hopkins Health System in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Johns Hopkins Health System averages 0.8 TCR (11% of the General medical and surgical hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Johns Hopkins Health System TCR series: 2017=0.6 · 2018=0.7 · 2020=0.7 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 7.5

Where Johns Hopkins Health System falls in its industry

6,862 General medical and surgical h establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 70 General medical and surgical h employers in Maryland.

Johns Hopkins Health System (4,124 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Johns Hopkins Health System
Johns Hopkins Health System (4,124 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Johns Hopkins Health System has more employees than the General medical and surgical hospitals median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 0.6 43 0 0
2023 1.1 0.5 53 0 0
2022 0.5 0.3 20 0 0
2020 0.7 0.5 13 6 0
2018 0.7 0.4 16 0 0
2017 0.6 0.2 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · MD · Baltimore

6,862 General medical and surgical hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 1,031 employers in Baltimore, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LVH-1503 N. Cedar Crest 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tech Way - 8520 Tech Way 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Van Buren County Hospital 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Loring Hospital 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE AstraZeneca Gaithersburg Campus 4,117 FTE
STATE-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : DCA1 4,104 FTE
STATE-SIZE CARTER EWP 556 4,102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greater Baltimore Medical Center 4,221 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins Hospital 12,523 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Medical Center 7,980 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinai Hospital of Baltimore 7,770 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGMS-T340 6,180 FTE
NAT-TCR Glendi Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR O&M Granite City 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Aj Gallagher Cafe Retail 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR US Gypsum Washingtonville 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harrisonburg Processing 4,130 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mosaic Medical Center- St. Joseph 4,130 FTE
NAT-SIZE LAZ Parking California, LLC 4,117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Methodist Hospital 4,131 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.