Refuse collecting and operating solid waste landfills · California

Johnson Canyon Landfill

Salinas, CA · ~55 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Johnson Canyon Landfill runs at 328% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Refuse collecting and operating solid waste landfills workplace, earning a grade F.

Johnson Canyon Landfill: 8.5 TCR = 328% of Refuse collecting and operating solid waste landfills BLS 2.6 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Johnson Canyon Landfill safety composite

Johnson Canyon Landfill scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Johnson Canyon Landfill: 6.6 → 12.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 13.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.06× in 2022

Johnson Canyon Landfill's TCR rose 6.0 from 6.6 in 2016 to 12.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 13.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562212 · Salinas, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.5 · 328% of ind

  • DART 9.0 DART
  • RANK #29/41
  • PHOTO City of Goldsboro/ S…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Goldsboro/ Solid Waste Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Johnson Canyon Landfill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Johnson Canyon Landfill averages 8.5 TCR (328% of the Refuse collecting and operating solid waste landfills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Johnson Canyon Landfill TCR series: 2016=6.6 · 2018=13.8 · 2019=7.8 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=12.6 · BLS 2.6

Where Johnson Canyon Landfill falls in its industry

288 Refuse collecting and operatin establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 41 Refuse collecting and operatin employers in California.

Johnson Canyon Landfill (55 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Johnson Canyon Landfill
Johnson Canyon Landfill (55 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Johnson Canyon Landfill has more employees than the Refuse collecting and operating solid wa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 12.6 9.0 5 2 0
2021 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2019 7.8 7.8 4 0 0
2018 13.8 7.9 7 0 0
2016 6.6 6.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562212 · CA · Salinas

288 Refuse collecting and operating solid waste landfills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 337 employers in Salinas, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Goldsboro/ Solid Waste Division 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metro Park East Landfill 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rhode Island Resource Recovery Corp 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Works 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE FARMING ADMINISTRATION 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dwelley Family Farms LLC 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-Valley Vineyard Management 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cornerstone Certified Vineyard 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foothill Packing 8,854 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foothill Packing-California 3,255 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salinas Valley Memorial Hospital 2,197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salinas Valley Healthcare System 2,133 FTE
NAT-TCR Oil City Plant 2 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR US WY Casper 5164 W Yellowstone 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 356800-Poughkeepsie Po 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR South Central Kansas Medical Center 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE BUF-ODFL 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metro Fire and Safety Equipment Company, Inc. 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Novozymes -108TW 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.