Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) · Wisconsin

Johnson Litho Graphics

Eau Claire, WI · ~47 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Johnson Litho Graphics runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) workplace, earning a grade B.

Johnson Litho Graphics: 1.9 TCR = 58% of Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Johnson Litho Graphics safety composite

Johnson Litho Graphics scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2024

Johnson Litho Graphics injury rate improved

Johnson Litho Graphics's TCR fell 1.4 from 4.1 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.1 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Eau Claire, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 58% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #36/126
  • PHOTO Printegra Royal
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Printegra Royal (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Johnson Litho Graphics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Johnson Litho Graphics averages 1.9 TCR (58% of the Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Johnson Litho Graphics TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Johnson Litho Graphics falls in its industry

2,001 Offset printing (except books, establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 126 Offset printing (except books, employers in Wisconsin.

Johnson Litho Graphics (47 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Johnson Litho Graphics
Johnson Litho Graphics (47 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Johnson Litho Graphics has fewer employees than the Offset printing (except books, printing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2023 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.1 0.0 2 0 0
2016 4.1 2.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · WI · Eau Claire

2,001 Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 271 employers in Eau Claire, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Printegra Royal 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kocher Enterprises Inc 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Multi-Color Scottsburg 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pantagraph Printing and Stationery Company 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Calf Source, LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE URUS Distribution Center 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Bend Service Center 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Contract Operations, Inc. 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Precision Pipeline, LLC 3,757 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Eau Claire Hospital (Whipple) 3,141 FTE
CITY-NEAR WWD Sacred Heart Hospital 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR STORE DIVISION ADMIN - 3019 900 FTE
NAT-TCR Mizkan America 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Silgan Plastics 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Owens Corning Denver Roofing 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tupelo, MS - 3406 W. Main St 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harding's #421 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Louisville 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peterbilt Illinois - Chicago, Inc. - Elmhurst 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Produce Distributors Inc. 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.