Water treatment and distribution · South Carolina

Joint Municipal Water and Sewer Commission

Lexington, SC · ~34 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Joint Municipal Water and Sewer Commission runs at 119% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Water treatment and distribution workplace, earning a grade C.

Joint Municipal Water and Sewer Commission: 1.4 TCR = 119% of Water treatment and distribution BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Joint Municipal Water and Sewer Commission safety composite

Joint Municipal Water and Sewer Commission scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Joint Municipal Water and Sewer Commission: 0.0 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Joint Municipal Water and Sewer Commission's TCR rose 2.9 from 0.0 in 2023 to 2.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Lexington, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.4 · 119% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/20
  • PHOTO Artesian Water Compa…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Artesian Water Company, Inc.- Newark Establishment (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Joint Municipal Water and Sewer Commission in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Joint Municipal Water and Sewer Commission averages 1.4 TCR (119% of the Water treatment and distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Joint Municipal Water and Sewer Commission TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 1.2

Where Joint Municipal Water and Sewer Commission falls in its industry

727 Water treatment and distributi establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 20 Water treatment and distributi employers in South Carolina.

Joint Municipal Water and Sewer Commission (34 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Joint Municipal Water and Sewer Commission
Joint Municipal Water and Sewer Commission (34 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Joint Municipal Water and Sewer Commission has fewer employees than the Water treatment and distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · SC · Lexington

727 Water treatment and distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 136 employers in Lexington, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Artesian Water Company, Inc.- Newark Establishment 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kanawha Valley Ops Center 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Warren County Water District 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Jersey American Water - Short Hills 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE TLG TURF 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE ArborGen Inc. Headquarters 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lancaster Operations Center 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marlboro Electric Cooperative Headquarters Office 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Lexington 1,630 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michelin US5 Lexington SC 1,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michelin North America US7 838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbia 760 FTE
NAT-TCR Metal Sales Manufacturing Corporation 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR STR0584 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Dallas 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Johnston 10242 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chicago 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE STK Electronics, Inc. DBA Pelco Component Technologies 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Insta Grains 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hodgman Drainage Company, Inc. 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.