Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) · Kansas

Kansas Fencing, Inc.

Topeka, KS · ~40 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kansas Fencing, Inc. runs at 251% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) workplace, earning a grade F.

Kansas Fencing, Inc.: 7.0 TCR = 251% of Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kansas Fencing, Inc. safety composite

Kansas Fencing, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Kansas Fencing, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Kansas Fencing, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.2 from 7.5 in 2016 to 7.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.5 · 2017=7.0 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=12.6 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=7.0 · 2022=6.0 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=7.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Topeka, KS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.0 · 251% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #25/26
  • PHOTO AAA Fence Company Inc
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AAA Fence Company Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Kansas Fencing, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kansas Fencing, Inc. averages 7.0 TCR (251% of the Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kansas Fencing, Inc. TCR series: 2016=7.5 · 2017=7 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=12.6 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=7 · 2022=6 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=7.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Kansas Fencing, Inc. falls in its industry

1,634 Fencing contractors (except el establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 26 Fencing contractors (except el employers in Kansas.

Kansas Fencing, Inc. (40 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Kansas Fencing, Inc.
Kansas Fencing, Inc. (40 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Kansas Fencing, Inc. has fewer employees than the Fencing contractors (except electronic c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.3 7.3 3 0 0
2023 4.3 2.2 2 0 0
2022 6.0 6.0 3 0 0
2021 7.0 4.7 3 0 0
2020 5.2 2.6 2 0 0
2019 12.6 3.1 4 0 0
2018 6.2 0.0 2 0 0
2017 7.0 3.5 2 0 0
2016 7.5 7.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · KS · Topeka

1,634 Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 319 employers in Topeka, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AAA Fence Company Inc 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Swimming Pool Services, Inc 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR AAA Fence Inc. 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Speck USA 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE MANHATTAN SC 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6271-2700 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE TUKH Cambridge Tower 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paul Wertenberger Construction Inc. 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stormont Vail Health - Hospital 2,589 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Tire Rubber Company 1,563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Topeka 1,499 FTE
CITY-NEAR The University of Kansas Health System St. Francis Campus 1,417 FTE
NAT-TCR Earth Energy Inc 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Design Master Displays 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Spirit Lake Branch 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NCO 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE River Terrace & Convention Center 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Real Alloy Recycling, LLC. 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mowrey Elevator Company, Inc. 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Braco Window Cleaning Service, Inc. 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.