Fixtures, store display, manufacturing · North Carolina

Design Master Displays

High Point, NC · ~94 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Design Master Displays runs at 213% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fixtures, store display, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Design Master Displays: 7.0 TCR = 213% of Fixtures, store display, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Design Master Displays safety composite

Design Master Displays scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.4

2016→2024

Design Master Displays injury rate improved

Design Master Displays's TCR fell 7.4 from 10.1 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.1 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=12.7 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337215 · High Point, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.0 · 213% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #13/15
  • PHOTO Middlebury
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 55 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Middlebury (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Design Master Displays in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Design Master Displays averages 7.0 TCR (213% of the Fixtures, store display, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Design Master Displays TCR series: 2016=10.1 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=12.7 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=4 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Design Master Displays falls in its industry

231 Fixtures, store display, manuf establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 15 Fixtures, store display, manuf employers in North Carolina.

Design Master Displays (94 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Design Master Displays
Design Master Displays (94 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Design Master Displays has more employees than the Fixtures, store display, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 1.8 3 0 0
2023 4.0 2.0 4 0 0
2022 6.6 2.2 6 0 0
2021 6.2 3.7 5 0 0
2020 8.3 4.2 8 0 0
2019 8.7 4.8 9 0 0
2018 12.7 7.0 9 0 0
2017 4.1 0.0 3 0 0
2016 10.1 5.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337215 · NC · High Point

231 Fixtures, store display, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 243 employers in High Point, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Middlebury 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lozier Corporation - Joplin 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pan oston 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Z-West 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pike Gas Services, LLC Florida Statewide Operations 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sharpe Brothers 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mechworks - Corporate 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE TK Elevator Raleigh 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR WFBMC - High Point Medical Center 1,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR CITY OF HIGH POINT 1,532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomas Built Buses 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Point Medical Center 1,370 FTE
NAT-TCR Earth Energy Inc 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 117 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kansas Fencing, Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Spirit Lake Branch 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wharton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hailey 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Fresh Market 137 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1112 LKQ Atlanta 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.