Home centers, building materials · Ohio
Keim Lumber Company
CHARM, OH · ~465 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 2.4
- Avg TCR
- 3.4
- Industry avg
- 1
- Fatality
The verdict
Keim Lumber Company runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate — safer than the typical Home centers, building materials workplace — earning a grade B.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 2.4
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.4
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 1
- worker fatalities on record
Grade compares Keim Lumber Company's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 8 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024).
Injury rate over time
Keim Lumber Company's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.4 industry benchmark.
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 444110.
Keim Lumber Company has an average TCR of 2.4, which is 70% of the industry average (3.4) for Home centers, building materials. This is better than average.
Safety Insights for Keim Lumber Company
Keim Lumber Company operates an establishment with approximately 465 full-time equivalent workers in CHARM, OH, classified under the Home centers, building materials industry (NAICS 444110). Across 8 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 91 recordable injuries, 2 occupational illnesses, and 1 workplace fatality. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.4 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the B letter grade (Good Safety Record).
Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 3.4 for Home centers, building materials, Keim Lumber Company's workforce experiences 70% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked — a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers — so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR below the benchmark signals that controls, training, or automation may be outperforming peers.
Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 8 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating Keim Lumber Company as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 1, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries — there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Keim Lumber Company's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source — name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor — OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 444110 — Home centers, building materials.
DART Rate — Transparent Calculation (2024)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
8 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 1,332,753 hours worked = 1.20 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904 — OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context — Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Keim Lumber Company (this establishment) | 2.39 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 8-year avg |
| Home centers, building materials industry avg | 3.40 | BLS IIF, NAICS 444110 |
| Ohio state avg (all industries) | 3.90 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics — Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Keim Lumber Company to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 14 reportable incidents · 13 injuries, 0 illnesses, 1 fatality — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 15 reportable incidents · 15 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2022: 11 reportable incidents · 11 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2021: 12 reportable incidents · 12 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2019: 13 reportable incidents · 12 injuries, 1 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 17 reportable incidents · 16 injuries, 1 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 6 reportable incidents · 6 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 6 reportable incidents · 6 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) — inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 12 | 1 | 0 |
| 2018 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 16 | 1 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Keim Lumber Company's safety grade?
How is the safety grade calculated?
How many injuries has Keim Lumber Company reported?
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.