Prefabricated institutional building erection · Pennsylvania
Kessel Construction Inc
Bradford, PA · ~30 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 7.4
- Avg TCR
- 2.9
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Kessel Construction Inc runs at 256% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Prefabricated institutional building erection workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 7.4
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 2.9
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 16
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Kessel Construction Inc's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 9 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). This reflects reported recordable injuries, not an independent safety inspection -- underreporting is a known limitation of employer self-recordkeeping.
Injury rate over time
Kessel Construction Inc's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 2.9 industry benchmark.
Where Kessel Construction Inc falls in its industry
6,114 Prefabricated institutional bu establishmentsSafer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.
Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #259 safest of 289 Prefabricated institutional bu employers in Pennsylvania.
Kessel Construction Inc has an average TCR of 7.4, which is 256% of the industry average (2.9) for Prefabricated institutional building erection. This is significantly worse than average.
The letter grade is a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA ITA and BLS benchmark data, not an official OSHA rating or safety certification. Full formula and thresholds: Methodology.
Trend analysis for Kessel Construction Inc
Between 2016 and 2024, Kessel Construction Inc's Total Case Rate worsened from 2.2 to 3.8 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 76% increase across 8 years of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2016, at a TCR of 2.2, while 2019 saw the highest rate, at 21.2, a spread of 19.1 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.
Summed across those 9 reporting years, Kessel Construction Inc recorded 16 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 9-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Kessel Construction Inc's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 236220 - Prefabricated institutional building erection.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
1 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 52,214 hours worked = 3.83 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Kessel Construction Inc (this establishment) | 7.41 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 9-year avg |
| Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building industry avg | 2.90 | BLS IIF, NAICS 236220 |
| Pennsylvania state avg (all industries) | 5.06 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Kessel Construction Inc to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 1 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 1 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 2 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 2 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2022: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2021: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2020: 2 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 1 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2019: 7 reportable incidents · 6 injuries, 1 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 3 reportable incidents · 3 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 2023 | 6.8 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 2022 | 6.9 | 3.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 7.1 | 0.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 7.1 | 3.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 2019 | 21.2 | 3.0 | 6 | 1 | 0 |
| 2018 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 8.7 | 5.8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Kessel Construction Inc's reported OSHA injury record versus its Prefabricated institutional building erection peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 256% of the Prefabricated institutional building erection benchmark, Kessel Construction Inc reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Prefabricated institutional building erection sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Kessel Construction Inc's safety grade?
How many injuries has Kessel Construction Inc reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry and by workforce size within Pennsylvania - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~7.4)
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.