Powder coating metals and metal products for the trade · Pennsylvania

Keystone Koating Lititz

Lititz, PA · ~46 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Keystone Koating Lititz runs at 117% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Powder coating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade C.

Keystone Koating Lititz: 3.9 TCR = 117% of Powder coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Keystone Koating Lititz safety composite

Keystone Koating Lititz scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Keystone Koating Lititz: 2.1 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 9.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.65× in 2024

Keystone Koating Lititz's TCR rose 0.4 from 2.1 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Lititz, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 117% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #16/45
  • PHOTO Shurpac Inc
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shurpac Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Keystone Koating Lititz in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Keystone Koating Lititz averages 3.9 TCR (117% of the Powder coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Keystone Koating Lititz TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=9.5 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=5 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Keystone Koating Lititz falls in its industry

646 Powder coating metals and meta establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 45 Powder coating metals and meta employers in Pennsylvania.

Keystone Koating Lititz (46 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Keystone Koating Lititz
Keystone Koating Lititz (46 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Keystone Koating Lititz has fewer employees than the Powder coating metals and metal products median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2023 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2022 4.9 0.0 2 0 0
2021 5.0 5.0 2 0 0
2020 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2019 9.5 6.3 6 0 0
2018 3.8 1.9 2 0 0
2017 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2016 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · PA · Lititz

646 Powder coating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 75 employers in Lititz, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shurpac Inc 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spray-Rite, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reparex 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AZZ Galvanizing - Beaumont 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Needham's Mushroom Farms, Inc. 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmers Pride Inc / Bell & Evans Hatchery 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mushroom Casing, Inc. 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer Elizabethtown ELI1 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Lititz 593 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson and Johnson Consumer Health Care Lititz 551 FTE
CITY-NEAR Landis Homes 519 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tait Towers Manufacturing LLC 482 FTE
NAT-TCR Main Office 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wood Electric, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Meriter Child & Adolescent 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Primex Plastics Design & Fabrication 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Transformer Technologies 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Douglas Steel Fabricating Corporation 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Triangle Precision Ind 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chagrin Falls 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.