Iron work, structural, contractors · Michigan

Douglas Steel Fabricating Corporation

Lansing, MI · ~46 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Douglas Steel Fabricating Corporation runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Iron work, structural, contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Douglas Steel Fabricating Corporation: 0.8 TCR = 27% of Iron work, structural, contractors BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Douglas Steel Fabricating Corporation safety composite

Douglas Steel Fabricating Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Douglas Steel Fabricating Corporation held a steady TCR band

Douglas Steel Fabricating Corporation's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238120 · Lansing, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/13
  • PHOTO Spartan Reinforcing,…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spartan Reinforcing, LLC - Houston, TX - 200538043 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Douglas Steel Fabricating Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Douglas Steel Fabricating Corporation averages 0.8 TCR (27% of the Iron work, structural, contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Douglas Steel Fabricating Corporation TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=0 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Douglas Steel Fabricating Corporation falls in its industry

705 Iron work, structural, contrac establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 13 Iron work, structural, contrac employers in Michigan.

Douglas Steel Fabricating Corporation (46 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Douglas Steel Fabricating Corporation
Douglas Steel Fabricating Corporation (46 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Douglas Steel Fabricating Corporation has fewer employees than the Iron work, structural, contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238120 · MI · Lansing

705 Iron work, structural, contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 410 employers in Lansing, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spartan Reinforcing, LLC - Houston, TX - 200538043 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ellison Steel, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri-City Ironworks Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Titan Steel Erectors, LLC 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fresh Solution Farms 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE DBA FALKNER FARMS 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE ROB MAINTENANCE 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE EDL Energy 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,608 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,446 FTE
CITY-NEAR LCC - Main 2,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Grand River Assembly 1,648 FTE
NAT-TCR Market Center Management Company 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 600 Community Dr 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Customer Service Group Robesonia Velocity Center 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CIL Electroplating Inc 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Keystone Koating Lititz 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Joseph 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Transformer Technologies 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE ATX Corporate 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.