Power generation, hydroelectric · California
Kings River Conservation District
Fresno, CA · ~38 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 3.1
- Avg TCR
- 1.2
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Kings River Conservation District runs at 263% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Power generation, hydroelectric workplace, earning a grade F.
Kings River Conservation District: 3.1 TCR = 263% of Power generation, hydroelectric BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Kings River Conservation District safety composite
Kings River Conservation District scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
35/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- D 3.15 per 100 workers
Safer than 51% of industry peers
- DART rate
- F 5.58 per 100 workers
Safer than 5% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 52% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
Rising injury rate
Kings River Conservation District: 2.6 → 5.6 TCR
Peak year 2022 @ 5.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.77× in 2022
Kings River Conservation District's TCR rose 3.0 from 2.6 in 2017 to 5.6 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 221111 · Fresno, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL
Grade F · TCR 3.1 · 263% of ind
- DART 5.6 DART
- RANK #3/6
- PHOTO Copper Valley Electr…
- BOOK 5y book
- INJ 4 inj
- SIZE ~38 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: Copper Valley Electric Association (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →
Kings River Conservation District in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- United States
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Bonneville Project
3.2 TCR
- This site
Kings River Conservation District
3.1 TCR
- Copper Valley
Copper Valley Electric Association
3.1 TCR
- Power Producti
Power Production
3.1 TCR
- NYSEG Lancaste
NYSEG Lancaster
3 TCR
What this shows Kings River Conservation District averages 3.1 TCR (263% of the Power generation, hydroelectric BLS benchmark).
Kings River Conservation District TCR series: 2017=2.6 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=2.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=5.6 · BLS 1.2
Where Kings River Conservation District falls in its industry
129 Power generation, hydroelectri establishmentsSafer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.
Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Power generation, hydroelectri employers in California.
Kings River Conservation District has fewer employees than the Power generation, hydroelectric median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 2018 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
221111 · CA · Fresno
129 Power generation, hydroelectric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | Copper Valley Electric Association | 3.1 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | United States Army Corps of Engineers, Bonneville Project | 3.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Power Production | 3.1 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | NYSEG Lancaster | 3.0 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | CAL-O SHIPPING | 38 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | GAR & S Farm Labor Services, Inc. | 38 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Supreme Almonds of California, Inc. | 38 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Bays Ranch Inc | 38 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | County of Fresno | 7,553 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Ag Force LLC | 6,430 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Community Regional Medical Ctr | 5,549 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Community Regional Medical Center | 4,921 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Bartelt Insulation Supply Inc | 3.1 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Midwest Precision Machining | 3.1 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Tops #268 | 3.1 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Tops #542 | 3.1 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | K.C. Larson, Inc. | 38 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Senior Suites at St. Clair Commons | 38 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Lyons & Hohl Paving Contractor | 38 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | District Wide | 38 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.