Electric power generation, hydroelectric · Alaska

Copper Valley Electric Association

Glennallen, AK · ~43 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Copper Valley Electric Association runs at 263% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, hydroelectric workplace, earning a grade F.

Copper Valley Electric Association: 3.1 TCR = 263% of Electric power generation, hydroelectric BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Copper Valley Electric Association safety composite

Copper Valley Electric Association scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2020→2024

Copper Valley Electric Association injury rate improved

Copper Valley Electric Association's TCR fell 2.5 from 2.5 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.5 · 2021=2.6 · 2023=7.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221111 · Glennallen, AK ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.1 · 263% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Kings River Conserva…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kings River Conservation District (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alaska employers → · Look up another →

Copper Valley Electric Association in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Copper Valley Electric Association averages 3.1 TCR (263% of the Electric power generation, hydroelectric BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Copper Valley Electric Association TCR series: 2020=2.5 · 2021=2.6 · 2023=7.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Copper Valley Electric Association falls in its industry

129 Electric power generation, hyd establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alaska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Electric power generation, hyd employers in Alaska.

Copper Valley Electric Association (43 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Copper Valley Electric Association
Copper Valley Electric Association (43 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Copper Valley Electric Association has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, hydroelectric median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 7.5 5.0 3 0 0
2021 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221111 · AK · Glennallen

129 Electric power generation, hydroelectric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,558 rated employers in Alaska with headcount on file · 5 employers in Glennallen, AK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kings River Conservation District 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR United States Army Corps of Engineers, Bonneville Project 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Power Production 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NYSEG Lancaster 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rig 1 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE ASRC Builders LLC 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE 103508 AAK DOWLING 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wasilla AK Yard 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Copper Valley Electric 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dept. of Transportation & Public Facilities (57) 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR CV Grocers Inc. 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dept. of Transportation & Public Facilities (58) 10 FTE
NAT-TCR Gonzalez Brothers Farm Services, Inc 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Judd Wire 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Carrier Commerical Services (Clifton) 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Manth Mfg. 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Timberline Mechanical Systems 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Turnstone Industrial Solutions LLC. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bentonville 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hotel Rose 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.