Electric power generation, hydroelectric · Oregon

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Bonneville Project

Cascade Locks, OR · ~150 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Bonneville Project runs at 265% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, hydroelectric workplace, earning a grade F.

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Bonneville Project: 3.2 TCR = 265% of Electric power generation, hydroelectric BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Bonneville Project safety composite

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Bonneville Project scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2017→2019

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Bonneville Project injury rate improved

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Bonneville Project's TCR fell 1.3 from 4.8 in 2017 to 3.5 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.92× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.8 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221111 · Cascade Locks, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 3.2 · 265% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO Copper Valley Electr…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~150 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Copper Valley Electric Association (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Bonneville Project in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows United States Army Corps of Engineers, Bonneville Project averages 3.2 TCR (265% of the Electric power generation, hydroelectric BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Bonneville Project TCR series: 2017=4.8 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=3.5 · BLS 1.2

Where United States Army Corps of Engineers, Bonneville Project falls in its industry

129 Electric power generation, hyd establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Electric power generation, hyd employers in Oregon.

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Bonneville Project (150 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate United States Army Corps of Engineers, Bonneville Project
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Bonneville Project (150 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Bonneville Project has more employees than the Electric power generation, hydroelectric median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.5 2.9 5 1 0
2018 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2017 4.8 2.1 5 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221111 · OR · Cascade Locks

129 Electric power generation, hydroelectric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 4 employers in Cascade Locks, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Copper Valley Electric Association 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kings River Conservation District 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Power Production 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smith Mountain Hydro 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Interfor 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Warrenton Lumber Mill 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGC Electronics America 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vetsource Oregon 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wanapa Room 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bear Mountain Forest Products, Inc. 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lignetics - Cascade Locks 20 FTE
NAT-TCR Southeast MA SNF LLC 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Husson Family Medicine 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 4054-Abs 0016 2988 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 192 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE IPG- Blythewood 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Penn Center Inc 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Armstrong Hilliard Plant 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Revision Military 150 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.