Administration · Minnesota

Options Minnesota - Main Office

Burnsville, MN · ~29 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Options Minnesota - Main Office runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Administration workplace, earning a grade B.

Options Minnesota - Main Office: 2.4 TCR = 63% of Administration BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Options Minnesota - Main Office safety composite

Options Minnesota - Main Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Options Minnesota - Main Office held a steady TCR band

Options Minnesota - Main Office's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=12.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · Burnsville, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/79
  • PHOTO Van Buren/Cass Distr…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Van Buren/Cass District Health Department (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Options Minnesota - Main Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Options Minnesota - Main Office averages 2.4 TCR (63% of the Administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Options Minnesota - Main Office TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=12.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Options Minnesota - Main Office falls in its industry

990 Administration establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 79 Administration employers in Minnesota.

Options Minnesota - Main Office (29 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Options Minnesota - Main Office
Options Minnesota - Main Office (29 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Options Minnesota - Main Office has fewer employees than the Administration median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 12.5 12.5 0 4 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · MN · Burnsville

990 Administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 243 employers in Burnsville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Van Buren/Cass District Health Department 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of South Windsor - Community Center 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stanley Street Treatment and Resources (SSTAR) 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Horton 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northern Plains Dairy LLP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE The tru Shrimp Company 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2530-Redwood Falls, MN-FND (Monsanto Co.) 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kasota Stone Fabricators 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ames Construction 2,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosemount Aerospace Inc (Burnsville MN) 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR ROSEMOUNT AEROSPACE INC_6830 1,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodrich - Sensors and Integrated Systems- Burnsville MN 1,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Times Supermarket Kailua 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Feild Work 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR RealAmerica Management LLC 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cee Kay Supply, INC 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wilderness Lake 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE American House - Rochester Village 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leach Grain & Milling Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knapp and Schlappi Lumber Co., Inc. 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.