Machine tools, metal cutting, manufacturing · New Jersey

Komo Machine

Lakewood, NJ · ~60 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Komo Machine runs at 292% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Machine tools, metal cutting, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.7
avg TCR · per 100 workers
3.3
industry benchmark (BLS)
37
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Komo Machine's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 6 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). This reflects reported recordable injuries, not an independent safety inspection -- underreporting is a known limitation of employer self-recordkeeping.

Injury rate over time

Komo Machine's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.

05101520 201620172018201920202021 5.73.3 Industry benchmarkKomo Machine TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 333517.

Where Komo Machine falls in its industry

429 Machine tools, metal cutting, establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 8 Machine tools, metal cutting, employers in New Jersey.

Komo Machine has an average TCR of 9.7, which is 292% of the industry average (3.3) for Machine tools, metal cutting, manufacturing. This is significantly worse than average.

The letter grade is a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA ITA and BLS benchmark data, not an official OSHA rating or safety certification. Full formula and thresholds: Methodology.

Trend analysis for Komo Machine

Between 2016 and 2021, Komo Machine's Total Case Rate improved from 9.3 to 5.7 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 39% decrease across 5 years of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2021, at a TCR of 5.7, while 2017 saw the highest rate, at 15.1, a spread of 9.4 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.

Summed across those 6 reporting years, Komo Machine recorded 37 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 6-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Komo Machine's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 333517 - Machine tools, metal cutting, manufacturing.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2021)

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

1 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 106,080 hours worked = 1.89 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Komo Machine (this establishment) 9.65 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 6-year avg
Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing industry avg 3.30 BLS IIF, NAICS 333517
New Jersey state avg (all industries) 4.90 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Komo Machine to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 5.7 1.9 3 0 0
2020 10.4 4.2 5 0 0
2019 8.2 4.9 5 0 0
2018 9.2 2.6 7 0 0
2017 15.1 9.6 11 0 0
2016 9.3 1.6 6 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Komo Machine's reported OSHA injury record versus its Machine tools, metal cutting, manufacturing peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.

  • At 292% of the Machine tools, metal cutting, manufacturing benchmark, Komo Machine reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Machine tools, metal cutting, manufacturing sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Komo Machine's safety grade?
Komo Machine has a safety grade of F (Failing Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 9.7 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.3 for Machine tools, metal cutting, manufacturing.
How many injuries has Komo Machine reported?
Komo Machine has reported 37 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 6 years of OSHA data (2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry and by workforce size within New Jersey - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Similar TCR (~9.7)

Similar size (~60 workers)

Explore More Safety Data

→ More employers in New Jersey → Industry: Machine tools, metal cutting, manufacturing → Safety grades explained → How to check employer safety → Understanding OSHA rates
Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Related

All employers → | Rankings →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.