Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly · Massachusetts

Kre-Bsl Husky Forge Hill Operation LLC

Franklin, MA · ~91 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kre-Bsl Husky Forge Hill Operation LLC runs at 299% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly workplace, earning a grade F.

Kre-Bsl Husky Forge Hill Operation LLC: 11.4 TCR = 299% of Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kre-Bsl Husky Forge Hill Operation LLC safety composite

Kre-Bsl Husky Forge Hill Operation LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.4

2019→2024

Kre-Bsl Husky Forge Hill Operation LLC injury rate improved

Kre-Bsl Husky Forge Hill Operation LLC's TCR fell 6.4 from 6.4 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 26.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=6.4 · 2020=26.7 · 2021=11.9 · 2022=14.8 · 2023=8.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Franklin, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.4 · 299% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #152/210
  • PHOTO Bridges by Epoch at …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bridges by Epoch at Pembroke (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Kre-Bsl Husky Forge Hill Operation LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kre-Bsl Husky Forge Hill Operation LLC averages 11.4 TCR (299% of the Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kre-Bsl Husky Forge Hill Operation LLC TCR series: 2019=6.4 · 2020=26.7 · 2021=11.9 · 2022=14.8 · 2023=8.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Kre-Bsl Husky Forge Hill Operation LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted Living Facilities for establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #152 safest of 210 Assisted Living Facilities for employers in Massachusetts.

Kre-Bsl Husky Forge Hill Operation LLC (91 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Kre-Bsl Husky Forge Hill Operation LLC
Kre-Bsl Husky Forge Hill Operation LLC (91 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Kre-Bsl Husky Forge Hill Operation LLC has more employees than the Assisted Living Facilities for the Elder median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 8.5 3.4 5 0 0
2022 14.8 14.8 2 6 0
2021 11.9 11.9 6 0 0
2020 26.7 25.1 5 12 0
2019 6.4 6.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Franklin

6,510 Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 85 employers in Franklin, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bridges by Epoch at Pembroke 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PF MLR ALF Ops, LLC 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vineyard Park Puyallup 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heartis Longview 11.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Weston Nurseries 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wise Construction 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlantic Boston Construction 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE CSI NE 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Taunton 1,691 FTE
CITY-NEAR Franklin 55 675 FTE
CITY-NEAR Franklin 50 670 FTE
CITY-NEAR Horace Mann Educational Associates 633 FTE
NAT-TCR Seattle Parks and Recreation 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR TXH002 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 50th 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pomp's Tire - Bedford 073 11.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Durant Healthcare, LLC 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amita Health Alexian Brothers Medical Center 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maricopa County - Human Resources (310) 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Belmont Village Memphis 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.