General Warehousing and Storage · Florida

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (JPT-6625)

Jupiter, FL · ~74 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (JPT-6625) runs at 94% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade C.

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (JPT-6625): 5.4 TCR = 94% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (JPT-6625) safety composite

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (JPT-6625) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.6

2017→2023

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (JPT-6625) injury rate improved

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (JPT-6625)'s TCR fell 5.6 from 9.2 in 2017 to 3.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.2 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=6.0 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Jupiter, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.4 · 94% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #281/412
  • PHOTO Fresno Distribution …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fresno Distribution Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (JPT-6625) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (JPT-6625) averages 5.4 TCR (94% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (JPT-6625) TCR series: 2017=9.2 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=6 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=3.6 · BLS 5.8

Where Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (JPT-6625) falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #281 safest of 412 General Warehousing and Storag employers in Florida.

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (JPT-6625) (74 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (JPT-6625)
Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (JPT-6625) (74 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (JPT-6625) has fewer employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.6 3.6 3 0 0
2022 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2021 4.7 4.7 2 1 0
2020 6.0 6.0 3 1 0
2019 7.5 7.5 5 0 0
2018 4.6 3.0 3 0 0
2017 9.2 9.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · FL · Jupiter

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 95 employers in Jupiter, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fresno Distribution Center 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR WSI- Specialists Avenue East 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR LeSaint Logistics-Cleveland 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kraft Springfield WHS 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Richard Hagstrom Ferneries 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perrine Svc Cntr & Str 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Florida Distribution Control Center 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE PC1 Panama City Administration Line Service Center 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pratt & Whitney - West Palm Beach 1,579 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter 17900 Beeline Hw (5235) 1,170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Asplundh Tree Expert LLC-055 702 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Jupiter Beeline Hwy DFC (5295) 691 FTE
NAT-TCR Douglass Colony Group Colorado Springs. 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Compassus - Jackson 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Madison Children's Museum 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR San Mateo Marriott 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (TOA-6617) 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cash Saver 237 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holloman AFB 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dept. of Education & Early Development (8) 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.