Airborne radio communications equipment manufacturing · New Jersey

L3 Technologies - Communication Systems East

Camden, NJ · ~638 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

L3 Technologies - Communication Systems East runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Airborne radio communications equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

L3 Technologies - Communication Systems East: 0.5 TCR = 14% of Airborne radio communications equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

L3 Technologies - Communication Systems East safety composite

L3 Technologies - Communication Systems East scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

L3 Technologies - Communication Systems East held a steady TCR band

L3 Technologies - Communication Systems East's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.5 in 2016 to 0.5 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.5 · 2018=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334220 · Camden, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #2/7
  • PHOTO HAZSD01
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~638 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HAZSD01 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

L3 Technologies - Communication Systems East in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows L3 Technologies - Communication Systems East averages 0.5 TCR (14% of the Airborne radio communications equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

L3 Technologies - Communication Systems East TCR series: 2016=0.5 · 2018=0.5 · BLS 3.3

Where L3 Technologies - Communication Systems East falls in its industry

247 Airborne radio communications establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 7 Airborne radio communications employers in New Jersey.

L3 Technologies - Communication Systems East (638 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate L3 Technologies - Communication Systems East
L3 Technologies - Communication Systems East (638 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1

L3 Technologies - Communication Systems East has more employees than the Airborne radio communications equipment median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.5 0.3 3 0 0
2016 0.5 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334220 · NJ · Camden

247 Airborne radio communications equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 93 employers in Camden, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HAZSD01 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CommScope (Forest, VA) 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR TX141 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Miami Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE REPC - PA 639 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Luke's Warren Hospital 637 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOUTH JERSEY_1441024 636 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crystal Springs Services, Inc 636 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper University Hospital 10,223 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 Cooper Plaza 6,439 FTE
CITY-NEAR Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center 2,283 FTE
CITY-NEAR Virtua Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Inc 1,906 FTE
NAT-TCR FGG Pensacola 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 2073-ASA-20730099-AD 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Accredo Health Group, Inc. Memphis, TN 1640 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodrich - Sensors and Integrated Systems - Vergennes VT 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 9706 - Dfw - Csoc 638 FTE
NAT-SIZE Universal City 638 FTE
NAT-SIZE AR-West Memphis-Operating Center 638 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boars Head Holland 638 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.