Inertial navigation systems, aeronautical, manufacturing · New Jersey

L3 Technologies, Space and Navigation

Name: L3 Technologies, Space and Navigation Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Budd Lake, NJ · ~93 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 0.5
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

L3 Technologies, Space and Navigation runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Inertial navigation systems, aeronautical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

L3 Technologies, Space and Navigation: 0.5 TCR = 15% of Inertial navigation systems, aeronautical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

L3 Technologies, Space and Navigation safety composite

L3 Technologies, Space and Navigation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2017→2018

L3 Technologies, Space and Navigation injury rate improved

L3 Technologies, Space and Navigation's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.0 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Budd Lake, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 15% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #8/16
PHOTO L3Harris Technologie…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 0 inj
SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: L3Harris Technologies INC Wickham Campus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

This site

0.5
L3Harris Techn

0.5
NGMS-N240

0.5
HGAKB01

0.5
HNJFP01

0.5

What this shows L3 Technologies, Space and Navigation averages 0.5 TCR (15% of the Inertial navigation systems, aeronautical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

L3 Technologies, Space and Navigation TCR series: 2017=1 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.3

Where L3 Technologies, Space and Navigation falls in its industry

388 Inertial navigation systems, a establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 16 Inertial navigation systems, a employers in New Jersey.

L3 Technologies, Space and Navigation (93 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

L3 Technologies, Space and Navigation has fewer employees than the Inertial navigation systems, aeronautica median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2018	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2017	1.0	0.0	0	1	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · NJ · Budd Lake

388 Inertial navigation systems, aeronautical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 12 employers in Budd Lake, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	L3Harris Technologies INC Wickham Campus	MELBOURNE, FL	0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	NGMS-N240	WOODLAND HILLS, CA	0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	HGAKB01	KINGS BAY, GA	0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	HNJFP01	FLORHAM PARK, NJ	0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Automatic Rolls of New Jersey	EDISON	93 FTE
STATE-SIZE	The Harris Freeman Group of Companies NJ	MOORESTOWN	93 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Lallypak Inc	HILLSIDE	93 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Owens Corning Roofing Plant	KEARNY	93 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Givaudan Fragrance MTO-West	Budd Lake	200 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Robertet Frangrances	Budd Lake	140 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Amazon.com Services LLC - DNJ7	Budd Lake	135 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Coherent Mt. Olive, NJ	Budd Lake	109 FTE
NAT-TCR	CINGWA0059	Bothell, WA	0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Wichita KS Main	Wichita, KS	0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	AMTOPP Phoenix	Phoenix, AZ	0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	HoneywellMN14	Plymouth, MN	0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE	RBI Solar Inc.	Cincinnati, OH	93 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Salt-Akron	Akron, OH	93 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Corporate Warehouse	Farmington Hills, MI	93 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Good Shepherd Rehabilitation & Nursing Center	Jaffrey, NH	93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.