Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing · California

NGMS-N240

Woodland Hills, CA · ~1,099 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NGMS-N240 runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

NGMS-N240: 0.5 TCR = 15% of Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NGMS-N240 safety composite

NGMS-N240 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

NGMS-N240 held a steady TCR band

NGMS-N240's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.4 in 2017 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.4 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Woodland Hills, CA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #15/45
  • PHOTO HGAKB01
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~1,099 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HGAKB01 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

NGMS-N240 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NGMS-N240 averages 0.5 TCR (15% of the Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NGMS-N240 TCR series: 2017=0.4 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 3.3

Where NGMS-N240 falls in its industry

388 Search, Detection, Navigation, establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 45 Search, Detection, Navigation, employers in California.

NGMS-N240 (1,099 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate NGMS-N240
NGMS-N240 (1,099 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

NGMS-N240 has more employees than the Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.3 2 1 0
2023 0.8 0.7 4 5 0
2022 0.8 0.8 2 7 0
2021 0.3 0.3 0 4 0
2020 0.5 0.4 4 2 0
2019 0.6 0.3 3 4 0
2018 0.3 0.3 3 0 0
2017 0.4 0.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · CA · Woodland Hills

388 Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 64 employers in Woodland Hills, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HGAKB01 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockwell Collins - Cedar Rapids Main Plant 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR L3Harris Technologies INC Wickham Campus 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR L3 Technologies, Space and Navigation 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6403-64030227 1,100 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6403-64030310 1,101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Behavioral Health 1,097 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lemoore West Plant 1,096 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 261 2,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08681251 WOODLAND HILLS MED CENTER 2,074 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-08681251 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08881251 WOODLAND HILLS MEDICAL CENTER 1,475 FTE
NAT-TCR Weldon Pump LLC 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Yamada America, Inc 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Centurion Construction Group LLC 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Concare Inc 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Toyotetsu America, Inc. 1,099 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy Medical Center 1,099 FTE
NAT-SIZE Janssen Malvern 1,099 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ochsner Medical Center-North Shore 1,099 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.