Airborne navigational systems manufacturing · Florida

L3Harris Technologies INC Palm Bay Campus

Palm Bay, FL · ~4,239 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

L3Harris Technologies INC Palm Bay Campus runs at 5% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Airborne navigational systems manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

L3Harris Technologies INC Palm Bay Campus: 0.1 TCR = 5% of Airborne navigational systems manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

L3Harris Technologies INC Palm Bay Campus safety composite

L3Harris Technologies INC Palm Bay Campus scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

L3Harris Technologies INC Palm Bay Campus held a steady TCR band

L3Harris Technologies INC Palm Bay Campus's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.2 in 2022 to 0.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.2 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Palm Bay, FL AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 5% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/38
  • PHOTO Albuquerque - SES
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~4,239 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Albuquerque - SES (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

L3Harris Technologies INC Palm Bay Campus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows L3Harris Technologies INC Palm Bay Campus averages 0.1 TCR (5% of the Airborne navigational systems manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

L3Harris Technologies INC Palm Bay Campus TCR series: 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=0.1 · BLS 3.3

Where L3Harris Technologies INC Palm Bay Campus falls in its industry

388 Airborne navigational systems establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 38 Airborne navigational systems employers in Florida.

L3Harris Technologies INC Palm Bay Campus (4,239 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate L3Harris Technologies INC Palm Bay Campus
L3Harris Technologies INC Palm Bay Campus (4,239 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

L3Harris Technologies INC Palm Bay Campus has more employees than the Airborne navigational systems manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.1 0.0 6 0 0
2023 0.1 0.0 5 0 0
2022 0.2 0.1 8 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · FL · Palm Bay

388 Airborne navigational systems manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 69 employers in Palm Bay, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Albuquerque - SES 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BAH 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NY, Rochester - Innovation Dr RTP 5-6 (SAS-SS) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Communication Systems : NY, Rochester - 1680 University Ave. (CS-TC) 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Medical Center 4,199 FTE
STATE-SIZE FLJAC - JACKSONVILLE 4,193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - MCO1 4,291 FTE
STATE-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : JAX2 4,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palm Bay FL 2400 Palm Bay Rd 4,081 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palm Bay FL 1,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palm Bay Hospital 653 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5455 421 FTE
NAT-TCR RRSC Home Office 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue Canyon Technologies - Crescent, LLC 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Westlake Royal Building Product 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Human Service Building OHA 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 900 - Corporate Office 4,231 FTE
NAT-SIZE MD-03 4,250 FTE
NAT-SIZE Health Texas Provider Network 4,227 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pfizer Field Force 4,227 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.