Durable goods agents and brokers, wholesale trade · New York

Pfizer Field Force

New York, NY · ~4,227 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pfizer Field Force runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Durable goods agents and brokers, wholesale trade workplace, earning a grade A.

Pfizer Field Force: 0.5 TCR = 20% of Durable goods agents and brokers, wholesale trade BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pfizer Field Force safety composite

Pfizer Field Force scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

Pfizer Field Force injury rate improved

Pfizer Field Force's TCR fell 0.4 from 0.7 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.7 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=1.0 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.1 · 2021=0.1 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 425120 · New York, NY AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO MNA - Raleigh/Field
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 176 inj
  • SIZE ~4,227 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MNA - Raleigh/Field (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Pfizer Field Force in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pfizer Field Force averages 0.5 TCR (20% of the Durable goods agents and brokers, wholesale trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pfizer Field Force TCR series: 2016=0.7 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=1 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.1 · 2021=0.1 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 2.2

Where Pfizer Field Force falls in its industry

243 Durable goods agents and broke establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Durable goods agents and broke employers in New York.

Pfizer Field Force (4,227 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pfizer Field Force
Pfizer Field Force (4,227 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Pfizer Field Force has more employees than the Durable goods agents and brokers, wholes median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.2 12 0 0
2023 0.2 0.1 6 0 0
2022 0.4 0.2 12 0 0
2021 0.1 0.1 5 0 0
2020 0.1 0.0 5 0 0
2019 0.6 0.3 23 2 0
2018 1.0 0.6 46 1 0
2017 0.7 0.4 35 0 1
2016 0.7 0.5 32 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

425120 · NY · New York

243 Durable goods agents and brokers, wholesale trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MNA - Raleigh/Field 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR EURPAC - DALLAS, TX 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2904-0288 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tundra Restaurant Supply, LLC 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE NY-04 4,202 FTE
STATE-SIZE NY-02 4,202 FTE
STATE-SIZE NYU Langone-Brooklyn 4,177 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lenox Hill Hosp 4,166 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR Bostwick 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Green Bay Packaging 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Virginia Division Office 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Flowserve Cookeville 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Health Texas Provider Network 4,227 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation Sunnyvale Campus (1066) 4,224 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Procter & Gamble Paper Products 4,223 FTE
NAT-SIZE 900 - Corporate Office 4,231 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.