Distribution line, sewer and water, construction · California

La Strada Pipeline, Inc.

Lake Forest, CA · ~38 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

La Strada Pipeline, Inc. runs at 351% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution line, sewer and water, construction workplace, earning a grade F.

La Strada Pipeline, Inc.: 9.8 TCR = 351% of Distribution line, sewer and water, construction BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

La Strada Pipeline, Inc. safety composite

La Strada Pipeline, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

La Strada Pipeline, Inc.: 7.8 → 14.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 21.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.89× in 2024

La Strada Pipeline, Inc.'s TCR rose 6.7 from 7.8 in 2018 to 14.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 21.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Lake Forest, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 351% of ind

  • DART 8.8 DART
  • RANK #192/201
  • PHOTO Utility Repair and A…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Utility Repair and Adjustments Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

La Strada Pipeline, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows La Strada Pipeline, Inc. averages 9.8 TCR (351% of the Distribution line, sewer and water, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

La Strada Pipeline, Inc. TCR series: 2018=7.8 · 2019=11.3 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=21.4 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=14.6 · BLS 2.8

Where La Strada Pipeline, Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Distribution line, sewer and w establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #192 safest of 201 Distribution line, sewer and w employers in California.

La Strada Pipeline, Inc. (38 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate La Strada Pipeline, Inc.
La Strada Pipeline, Inc. (38 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

La Strada Pipeline, Inc. has fewer employees than the Distribution line, sewer and water, cons median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.6 8.8 5 0 0
2023 6.1 0.0 1 1 0
2022 4.9 4.9 2 0 0
2021 21.4 21.4 8 0 0
2020 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 11.3 2.8 4 0 0
2018 7.8 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · CA · Lake Forest

1,614 Distribution line, sewer and water, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 90 employers in Lake Forest, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Utility Repair and Adjustments Inc 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Saginaw Maintenance and Service Dept. 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wenatchee 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rons Construction Corporation 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O SHIPPING 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAR & S Farm Labor Services, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supreme Almonds of California, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bays Ranch Inc 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Panasonic Avionics Corporation 2,047 FTE
CITY-NEAR ARB, Inc. 1,334 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spectrum Brands, Lake Forest 598 FTE
CITY-NEAR ASSA ABLOY Americas Residential, Inc., Lake Forest 594 FTE
NAT-TCR Se - Telford Truss 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodland Elementary School 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Acme Manufacturing Company, Inc. 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bermo 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE El Rey Court 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valdosta Office 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Del R Gilbert & Son Block Co., Inc 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gypsum Supply Byron Center 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.