Retirement communities, continuing care · California

La Vida at Mission Viejo

Mission Viejo, CA · ~83 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

La Vida at Mission Viejo runs at 353% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade F.

La Vida at Mission Viejo: 13.4 TCR = 353% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

La Vida at Mission Viejo safety composite

La Vida at Mission Viejo scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

La Vida at Mission Viejo: 3.5 → 7.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 28.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.19× in 2022

La Vida at Mission Viejo's TCR rose 4.1 from 3.5 in 2017 to 7.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 28.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Mission Viejo, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.4 · 353% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #160/216
  • PHOTO Lions Gate CCRC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lions Gate CCRC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

La Vida at Mission Viejo in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows La Vida at Mission Viejo averages 13.4 TCR (353% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

La Vida at Mission Viejo TCR series: 2017=3.5 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=15.5 · 2020=28.5 · 2021=21.6 · 2022=7.6 · BLS 3.8

Where La Vida at Mission Viejo falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #160 safest of 216 Retirement communities, contin employers in California.

La Vida at Mission Viejo (83 employees, TCR 13.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate La Vida at Mission Viejo
La Vida at Mission Viejo (83 employees, TCR 13.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

La Vida at Mission Viejo has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.6 2.5 1 2 0
2021 21.6 17.8 9 8 0
2020 28.5 16.0 11 5 0
2019 15.5 4.7 7 3 0
2018 3.9 0.0 3 0 0
2017 3.5 3.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Mission Viejo

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 77 employers in Mission Viejo, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lions Gate CCRC 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Building 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bayshore Memory Care 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morning Pointe of Hixson 13.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunny Slope Trees 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Land Co. (Grangeville) 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Land Co. (Stratford Shop) 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Land Co. (Lemoore Shop) 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA822 MISSION HOSPITAL MISSION VIEJO HR 2,178 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DCX2 347 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Coast Community Services 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Viejo 526 298 FTE
NAT-TCR 352897-Flg-Maspeth Sta 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Auto Truck Kansas City 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-AA-BNA-NASHVILLE-BNA-TRML 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Warehouse #1 13.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4795-PD-ILM-WILMINGTON-ILM-PDMT 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-PD-GSP-GREENVILLE-SPARTANBURG-GSP-PDMT 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tarter Gate West 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Watkw - Seattle 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.