Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Michigan

Lakeview Assisted Living, LLC

Battle Creek, MI · ~46 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lakeview Assisted Living, LLC runs at 273% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Lakeview Assisted Living, LLC: 10.4 TCR = 273% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lakeview Assisted Living, LLC safety composite

Lakeview Assisted Living, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lakeview Assisted Living, LLC held a steady TCR band

Lakeview Assisted Living, LLC's TCR held near 0.1 from 15.2 in 2020 to 15.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=15.2 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=15.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Battle Creek, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.4 · 273% of ind

  • DART 10.1 DART
  • RANK #152/201
  • PHOTO ABBY BAYTOWN LP
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ABBY BAYTOWN LP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Lakeview Assisted Living, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lakeview Assisted Living, LLC averages 10.4 TCR (273% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lakeview Assisted Living, LLC TCR series: 2020=15.2 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=15.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Lakeview Assisted Living, LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #152 safest of 201 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Michigan.

Lakeview Assisted Living, LLC (46 employees, TCR 10.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Lakeview Assisted Living, LLC
Lakeview Assisted Living, LLC (46 employees, TCR 10.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Lakeview Assisted Living, LLC has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.2 10.1 6 0 0
2023 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2022 8.6 5.7 1 2 0
2020 15.2 15.2 2 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MI · Battle Creek

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 161 employers in Battle Creek, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ABBY BAYTOWN LP 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone Residence Senior Care 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Wellington 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carlton Senior Living SAC Enhanced 10.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fresh Solution Farms 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE DBA FALKNER FARMS 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE ROB MAINTENANCE 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE EDL Energy 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Denso Manufacturing of Michigan 2,702 FTE
CITY-NEAR BRONSON BATTLE CREEK 1,530 FTE
CITY-NEAR Battle Creek HQ Corporate Office 1,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR I I Stanley Co., Inc. 729 FTE
NAT-TCR Applewood Plumbing, Heating, & Electric 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Hyatt at SFO 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Olathe Ks 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR North 40 Outfitters #E 10.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE LAX 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cincinnati,OH - 318 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Bridge at Greeley 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Feazel Electrical Contracting Inc 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.