Car repair shops, general · Minnesota

LaMettry's Collision - Lakeville

Lakeville, MN · ~20 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

LaMettry's Collision - Lakeville runs at 278% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Car repair shops, general workplace, earning a grade F.

LaMettry's Collision - Lakeville: 5.8 TCR = 278% of Car repair shops, general BLS 2.1 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

LaMettry's Collision - Lakeville safety composite

LaMettry's Collision - Lakeville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2017→2024

LaMettry's Collision - Lakeville injury rate improved

LaMettry's Collision - Lakeville's TCR fell 3.3 from 8.7 in 2017 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 12.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.7 · 2018=4.9 · 2020=9.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=12.0 · 2024=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811111 · Lakeville, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.8 · 278% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/53
  • PHOTO 6769
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 6769 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

LaMettry's Collision - Lakeville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows LaMettry's Collision - Lakeville averages 5.8 TCR (278% of the Car repair shops, general BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

LaMettry's Collision - Lakeville TCR series: 2017=8.7 · 2018=4.9 · 2020=9.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=12 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 2.1

Where LaMettry's Collision - Lakeville falls in its industry

609 Car repair shops, general establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 53 Car repair shops, general employers in Minnesota.

LaMettry's Collision - Lakeville (20 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 40 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate LaMettry's Collision - Lakeville
LaMettry's Collision - Lakeville (20 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 40 employees and a TCR of 4.2

LaMettry's Collision - Lakeville has fewer employees than the Car repair shops, general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 0.0 1 0 0
2023 12.0 8.0 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 9.9 0.0 2 0 0
2018 4.9 0.0 1 0 0
2017 8.7 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811111 · MN · Lakeville

609 Car repair shops, general employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 141 employers in Lakeville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 6769 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nuss Truck & Equipment- Eau Claire 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TRAILER CONDITIONER INC. (FLTCI) 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6737 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE C74 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE MNSGA-SEL-SELECT GENETICS ADMIN' 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bees Minnesota 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glyndon 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeville Technical Center 645 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schmitty & Sons 640 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hearthside Foods Solutions 634 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1484 - Lakeville 414 FTE
NAT-TCR Dublin San Ramon Services District 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Saint Mary'S Regional Medical Center (Smmc) 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Rouses Market #66 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR S09489 - WM Indian River County 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Branch 321 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carris Reels Plastics VT 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Northgate School District 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE LBJ Store #2105 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.