Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) · North Carolina
Land Use Center: Utilities, Envir. Hlth, Heritage, Library, Bldg Inspections, Veterans & Planning
Smithfield, NC · ~112 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 1.7
- Avg TCR
- 3.2
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Land Use Center: Utilities, Envir. Hlth, Heritage, Library, Bldg Inspections, Veterans & Planning runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) workplace, earning a grade B.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 1.7
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.2
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 10
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Land Use Center: Utilities, Envir. Hlth, Heritage, Library, Bldg Inspections, Veterans & Planning's OSHA Total Case Rate of 1.7 to the Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS benchmark of 3.2 (53% of benchmark) across 6 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Land Use Center: Utilities, Envir. Hlth, Heritage, Library, Bldg Inspections, Veterans & Planning's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.2 industry benchmark.
Where Land Use Center: Utilities, Envir. Hlth, Heritage, Library, Bldg Inspections, Veterans & Planning falls in its industry
1,208 Executive offices, federal, st establishmentsSafer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.
Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 55 Executive offices, federal, st employers in North Carolina.
Trend analysis for Land Use Center: Utilities, Envir. Hlth, Heritage, Library, Bldg Inspections, Veterans & Planning
Between 2017 and 2024, Land Use Center: Utilities, Envir. Hlth, Heritage, Library, Bldg Inspections, Veterans & Planning's Total Case Rate improved from 3.3 to 0.0 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 100% decrease across 7 years of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2024, at a TCR of 0.0, while 2017 saw the highest rate, at 3.3, a spread of 3.3 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.
Summed across those 6 reporting years, Land Use Center: Utilities, Envir. Hlth, Heritage, Library, Bldg Inspections, Veterans & Planning recorded 10 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 6-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 10 injuries shown on this page for Land Use Center: Utilities, Envir. Hlth, Heritage, Library, Bldg Inspections, Veterans & Planning are sourced from its own 6 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 921110 - Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president).
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 224,028 hours worked = 0.00 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Land Use Center: Utilities, Envir. Hlth, Heritage, Library, Bldg Inspections, Veterans & Planning (this establishment) | 1.70 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 6-year avg |
| Mayor's offices industry avg | 3.20 | BLS IIF, NAICS 921110 |
| North Carolina state avg (all industries) | 3.89 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Land Use Center: Utilities, Envir. Hlth, Heritage, Library, Bldg Inspections, Veterans & Planning to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 0 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2022: 3 reportable incidents · 3 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2019: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 3 reportable incidents · 3 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 3.3 | 0.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Land Use Center: Utilities, Envir. Hlth, Heritage, Library, Bldg Inspections, Veterans & Planning's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 53% of the Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) benchmark, Land Use Center: Utilities, Envir. Hlth, Heritage, Library, Bldg Inspections, Veterans & Planning reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Land Use Center: Utilities, Envir. Hlth, Heritage, Library, Bldg Inspections, Veterans & Planning's safety grade?
How many injuries has Land Use Center: Utilities, Envir. Hlth, Heritage, Library, Bldg Inspections, Veterans & Planning reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within North Carolina, and by nearby establishments in Smithfield - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~1.7)
Similar size (~112 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.